Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31984253›Full record

ReviewACS omega2020

Crowd-Sourced Chemistry: Considerations for Building a Standardized Database to Improve Omic Analyses.

Jaqueline A Picache, Jody C May, John A McLean

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jaqueline A PicacheDepartment of Chemistry, Center for Innovative Technology, Vanderbilt Institute of Chemical Biology, Vanderbilt Institute for Integrative Biosystems Research and Education, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235, United States.
Jody C MayDepartment of Chemistry, Center for Innovative Technology, Vanderbilt Institute of Chemical Biology, Vanderbilt Institute for Integrative Biosystems Research and Education, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235, United States.
John A McLeanDepartment of Chemistry, Center for Innovative Technology, Vanderbilt Institute of Chemical Biology, Vanderbilt Institute for Integrative Biosystems Research and Education, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235, United States.

Funding

Chemistry-Biology Interface Training GrantT32GM065086 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BACHMANN, BRIAN O, SULIKOWSKI, GARY ALLEN · 2002 to 2022
$7.0M
New Methodologies for Accelerating Natural Product DiscoveryR01GM092218 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BACHMANN, BRIAN O, MCLEAN, JOHN ALAN · 2010 to 2018
$2.8M
Ion mobility based informatics and visualization strategies in support of metabolomicsR03CA222452 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MCLEAN, JOHN ALAN · 2017 to 2017
$152k
NCI NIH HHS R03 CA222452NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM092218NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM065086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass spectrometry (MS) is used in multiple omics disciplines to generate large collections of data. This data enables advancements in biomedical research by providing global profiles of a given system. One of the main barriers to generating these profiles is the inability to accurately annotate omics data, especially small molecules. To complement pre-existing large databases that are not quite complete, research groups devote efforts to generating personal libraries to annotate their data. Scientific progress is impeded during the generation of these personal libraries because the data contained within them is often redundant and/or incompatible with other databases. To overcome these redundancies and incompatibilities, we propose that communal, crowd-sourced databases be curated in a standardized fashion. A small number of groups have shown this model is feasible and successful. While the needs of a specific field will dictate the functionality of a communal database, we discuss some features to consider during database development. Special emphasis is made on standardization of terminology, documentation, format, reference materials, and quality assurance practices. These standardization procedures enable a field to have higher confidence in the quality of the data within a given database. We also discuss the three conceptual pillars of database design as well as how crowd-sourcing is practiced. Generating open-source databases requires front-end effort, but the result is a well curated, high quality data set that all can use. Having a resource such as this fosters collaboration and scientific advancement.

Identifiers

PMID31984253
PMCPMC6977078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.