ArticleOncoscience2019
Improving patient classification and biomarker assessment using Gaussian Mixture Models and Bayes' rule.
Article in Oncoscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combined use of plasma p-tau217, NfL, and GFAP predicts domain-specific cognitive decline in cognitively unimpaired and MCI individuals.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- The g3mclass is a practical software for multiclass classification on biomarkers.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In clinical research, determining cutoff values for continuous variables in test results remains challenging, particularly when considering candidate biomarkers or therapeutic targets for disease. Distribution of a continuous variable into two populations is known as dichotomization and has been commonly used in clinical studies. We recently reported a new method for determining multiple cutoffs for continuous variables. The development of this original approach was based on fitting Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM) onto real-world clinical data. We also explored how to leverage Bayesian probability to minimize uncertainty while classifying individual patients into respective subpopulations. In addition, we investigated the performance of the proposed method for the distribution of classical prognostic markers in breast cancer. Finally, we applied the proposed method to analyze a candidate marker and a target for cancer therapy. Here, we present an overview of this method and our prospects for its implementation in biomedical and clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.