ArticleBiophysics and physicobiology2019
Combination of coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations and small-angle X-ray scattering experiments.
Article in Biophysics and physicobiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hybrid methods for combined experimental and computational determination of protein structure.The Journal of chemical physics · 2020Review
- Structural Characterization of Biomaterials by Means of Small Angle X-rays and Neutron Scattering (SAXS and SANS), and Light Scattering Experiments.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The combination of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), called the MD-SAXS method, is efficient for investigating protein dynamics. To overcome the time-scale limitation of all-atom MD simulations, coarse-grained (CG) representations are often utilized for biomolecular simulations. In this study, we propose a method to combine CG MD simulations with SAXS, termed the CG-MD-SAXS method. In the CG-MD-SAXS method, the scattering factors of CG particles for proteins and nucleic acids are evaluated using high-resolution structural data in the Protein Data Bank, and the excluded volume and the hydration shell are modeled using two adjustable parameters to incorporate solvent effects. To avoid overfitting, only the two parameters are adjusted for an entire structure ensemble. To verify the developed method, theoretical SAXS profiles for various proteins, DNA/RNA, and a protein-RNA complex are compared with both experimental profiles and theoretical profiles obtained by the all-atom representation. In the present study, we applied the CG-MD-SAXS method to the Swi5-Sfr1 complex and three types of nucleosomes to obtain reliable ensemble models consistent with the experimental SAXS data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.