ArticleBiophysics and physicobiology2019
More efficient screening of protein-protein complex model structures for reducing the number of candidates.
Article in Biophysics and physicobiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- TINA: a geometry-aware post-hoc scoring framework for protein-protein interaction.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2026Article
- Comprehensive In Silico Analysis of the CXCL12, C55Y Mutation Reveals Structural and Functional Disruption in CXCR4/CXCR7 Signaling.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2026Article
- An immunoinformatic approach to assessing the immunogenic capacity of alpha-neurotoxins in elapid snake venoms.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Structural Design and Analysis of the RHOA-ARHGEF1 Binding Mode: Challenges and Applications for Protein-Protein Interface Prediction.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rigid-body protein-protein docking is very efficient in generating tens of thousands of docked complex models (decoys) in a very short time without considering structure change upon binding, but typical docking scoring functions are not necessarily sufficiently accurate to narrow these decoys down to a small number of plausible candidates. Flexible refinements and sophisticated evaluation of the decoys are thus required to achieve more accurate prediction. Since this process is time-consuming, an efficient screening method to reduce the number of decoys is necessary immediately following rigid-body dockings. We attempted to develop an efficient screening method by clustering decoys generated by the rigid-body docking ZDOCK. We introduced the three metrics ligand-root-mean-square deviation (L-RMSD), interface-ligand-RMSD (iL-RMSD), and the fraction of common contacts (FCC), and examined various ranges of cut-offs for clusters to determine the best set of clustering parameters. Although the employed clustering algorithm is simple, it successfully reduced the number of decoys. Using iL-RMSD with a cut-off radius of 8 Å, the number of decoys that contain at least one near-native model with 90% probability decreased from 4,808 to 320, a 93% reduction in the original number of decoys. Using FCC for the clustering step, the top 1,000 success rates, defined as the probability that the top 1,000 models contain at least one near-native structure, reached 97%. We conclude that the proposed method is very efficient in selecting a small number of decoys that include near-native decoys.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.