Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31984077›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law2019

Assessing the Risk of Australian Indigenous Sexual Offenders Reoffending: A Review of the Research Literature and Court Decisions.

Alfred Allan, Catherine L Parry, Anna Ferrante, Christine Gillies, Catherine S Griffiths, Francis Morgan, Caroline Spiranovic, Stephen Smallbone, Hilde Tubex, Stephen C P Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Critical review of the use of the Rorschach in European courts.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2022
    Article
  2. Structuring the debate about research ethics in the psychology and law field: an international perspective.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alfred AllanSchool of Arts and Humanities, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7039-797X
Catherine L ParrySchool of Arts and Humanities, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.
Anna FerrantePHRN Centre for Data Linkage, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, WA, Australia.
Christine GilliesSchool of Law, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Catherine S GriffithsSchool of Population and Global Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Francis MorganSchool of Law, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Caroline SpiranovicSchool of Law, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Stephen SmallboneGriffith Criminology Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Hilde TubexLaw School, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Stephen C P WongDepartment of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada and Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assessment of offenders' risk of reoffending, particularly sexual reoffending, is a core activity of forensic mental health practitioners. The purpose of these assessments is to reduce the risk of harm to the public, but they are controversial and become more contentious when Australian practitioners who want to undertake such assessments in an ethically responsible way must use reliable validated instruments, disclose the limitations of their assessment methods, instruments and data to judicial decision-makers and understand how decision-makers might use their reports. The purpose of this systematic literature review was to explore the practices of Australian practitioners and courts in respect of the assessment of Australian Indigenous male sexual offenders' risk of reoffending. We could not identify an instrument that has been developed for the assessment of this population group. Australian courts differ in whether they admit and give weight to practitioners' evidence and opinions based on data obtained with non-validated instruments. We could only identify three possible predictor variables with enough quantitative support to justify including them in an instrument that could be used to assess Indigenous sexual offenders. There is a need for research regarding the validity of the instruments that practitioners use.

Indexed as

assessmentdetentionindigenouspreventativereoffendingrisksexual

Identifiers

PMID31984077
PMCPMC6762098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.