Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31983801›Full record

ArticlePolar biology2018

Resistance of Arctic phytoplankton to ocean acidification and enhanced irradiance.

C J M Hoppe, N Schuback, D Semeniuk, K Giesbrecht, J Mol, H Thomas, M T Maldonado, B Rost, D E Varela, P D Tortell

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Polar biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A story of resilience: Arctic diatomFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

C J M Hoppe1Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2509-0546
N Schuback1Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada.
D Semeniuk1Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada.
K Giesbrecht4School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC Canada.
J Mol5Department of Oceanography, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS Canada.
H Thomas5Department of Oceanography, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS Canada.
M T Maldonado1Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada.
B Rost2Marine Biogeosciences, Alfred Wegener Institute - Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany.
D E Varela4School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC Canada.
P D Tortell1Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Arctic Ocean is a region particularly prone to ongoing ocean acidification (OA) and climate-driven changes. The influence of these changes on Arctic phytoplankton assemblages, however, remains poorly understood. In order to understand how OA and enhanced irradiances (e.g., resulting from sea-ice retreat) will alter the species composition, primary production, and eco-physiology of Arctic phytoplankton, we conducted an incubation experiment with an assemblage from Baffin Bay (71°N, 68°W) under different carbonate chemistry and irradiance regimes. Seawater was collected from just below the deep Chl

Indexed as

Arctic OceanClimate changeDiatomsIrradiancesMultiple stressorsOcean acidificationPrimary production

Identifiers

PMID31983801
PMCPMC6952045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.