ArticleThe Journal of reproduction and development2020
Establishment of porcine nuclear transfer-derived embryonic stem cells using induced pluripotent stem cells as donor nuclei.
Article in The Journal of reproduction and development, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcriptomic insights and feeder-free culturing of porcine expanded potential stem cells from cloned embryos.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- Stem cell factor's role in enhancing the quality of fertilized and cloned porcine embryos for improved embryonic stem cell derivation.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated whether sequential reprogramming via porcine induced pluripotent stem cells (piPSCs) or exposure to oocyte cytoplasm following nuclear transfer could generate nuclear transfer-derived ESCs (piPSCs-ntESCs). Nuclear transfer embryos were reconstructed with piPSCs possessing a ZsGreen fluorescent marker for expression of exogenous Nanog and Lin28. Reconstructed oocytes developed to morphologically normal 8-cell/morulae (35/93, 37.6%) and blastocysts (12/93, 12.9%). Although most green fluorescent protein-positive blastocysts showed efficient outgrowth (8/10, 80%), none formed primary colonies and all cultures degenerated. Conversely, 15% of fluorescent positive 8-cell/morula stage embryos showed outgrowth (6/40), with three forming primary colonies (7.5%). All three were expanded and maintained as piPSC-ntESC lines. These cell lines expressed stem cell marker genes and proteins. Despite inactivation of one X chromosome, all piPSC-ntESC lines formed teratomas comprising derivatives from all three embryonic germ layers. Strong SSEA1, 3, and 4 expression was detected at the 8-cell/morula stage in embryos reconstructed from both piPSCs and porcine embryonic fibroblasts (PEFs). SSEA3 was notably absent from IVF controls at pre-implantation embryo stages. Finally, we attempted to establish ntESCs from 8-cell/morulae reconstructed with PEFs using the same culture conditions as those for piPSC-ntESC derivation. Although eight primary colonies arose from 107 embryos (7.5%), they all degenerated after the first passage culture. Early and sustained expression of key reprogramming regulatory factors may be critical for pluripotent stem cell derivation to derive piPSC-ntESCs from 8-cell/morula stages, while the expression of SSEAs may be involved in the initial stem cell colony formation phases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.