Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31983558›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2020

Evaluating Positron Emission Tomography-Based Functional Imaging Changes in the Heart After Chemo-Radiation for Patients With Lung Cancer.

Yevgeniy Vinogradskiy, Quentin Diot, Bernard Jones, Richard Castillo, Edward Castillo, Jennifer Kwak, Daniel Bowles, Inga Grills, Nicholas Myziuk, Thomas Guerrero and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Performance ofiScience · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Cardiac metabolic changes onJournal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yevgeniy VinogradskiyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado. Electronic address: yevgeniy.vinogradskiy@ucdenver.edu.
Quentin DiotDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Bernard JonesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Richard CastilloDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Edward CastilloDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Missouri.
Jennifer KwakDepartment of Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Daniel BowlesRocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado.
Inga GrillsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Missouri.
Nicholas MyziukDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Missouri.
Thomas GuerreroDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Missouri.
Craig StevensDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Missouri.
Tracey SchefterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Laurie E GasparDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Brian KavanaghDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Moyed MiftenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Chad RusthovenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
University of Colorado Denver · USBeaumont Health · USEmory University · US

Funding

Clinical trial personalizing radiation therapy through a novel lung function imaging modalityR01CA200817 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI VINOGRADSKIY, YEVGENIY · 2016 to 2018
$618k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA200817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeStudies have noted a link between radiation dose to the heart and overall survival (OS) for patients with lung cancer treated with chemoradiation. The purpose of this study was to characterize pre- to posttreatment cardiac metabolic changes using fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) images and to evaluate whether changes in cardiac metabolism predict for OS. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-nine patients enrolled in a functional avoidance prospective study who had undergone pre- and postchemoradiation FDG-PET imaging were evaluated. For each patient, the pretreatment and posttreatment PET/CTs were rigidly registered to the planning CT, dose, and structure set. PET-based metabolic dose-response was assessed by comparing pretreatment to posttreatment mean standardized uptake values (SUVmean) in the heart as a function of dose-bin. OS analysis was performed by comparing SUVmean changes for patients who were alive or had died at last follow-up and by using a multivariate model to assess whether pre- to posttreatment SUVmean changes were a predictor of OS.

resultsThe dose-response curve revealed increasing changes in SUV as a function of cardiac dose with an average SUVmean increase of 1.7% per 10 Gy. Patients were followed for a median of 437 days (range, 201-1131 days). SUVmean change was significantly predictive of OS on multivariate analysis with a hazard ratio of 0.541 (95% confidence intervals, 0.312-0.937). Patients alive at follow-up had an average increase of 17.2% in cardiac SUVmean while patients that died had an average decrease in SUVmean decrease of 13.5% (P = .048).

conclusionsOur data demonstrated that posttreatment SUV changes in the heart were significant indicators of dose-response and predictors of OS. The present work is hypothesis generating and must be validated in an independent cohort. If validated, our data show the potential for cardiac metabolic changes to be an early predictor for clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChemoradiotherapyFemaleHeartHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMyocardiumSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID31983558
PMCPMC7085939
OpenAlexW3001512703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.