Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31983364›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2021

Factors associated with home visits by volunteer community health workers to implement a home-fortification intervention in Bangladesh: a multilevel analysis.

Haribondhu Sarma, Md Tariqujjaman, Mduduzi Nn Mbuya, Sufia Askari, Cathy Banwell, Thomas J Bossert, Catherine D'Este, Tahmeed Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Haribondhu SarmaNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-1553-8498
Md TariqujjamanNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-0172-9501
Mduduzi Nn MbuyaGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Sufia AskariThe Children's Investment Fund Foundation, London, UK.
Cathy BanwellResearch School of Population Health, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.
Thomas J BossertHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Catherine D'EsteResearch School of Population Health, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.
Tahmeed AhmedNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBRAC, an international development organization based in Bangladesh, engages community health workers called Shasthya Shebikas (SS) to implement home fortification of foods with micronutrient powders (MNP). We identified factors associated with home visits by SS, at different levels of the BRAC programme-delivery hierarchy, to implement home-fortification interventions.

designWe conducted a cross-sectional survey, semi-structured interviews, and collected programme-related data from sub-districts included in the caregiver survey of BRAC's home-fortification programme and performed multilevel logistic regression modelling to investigate factors associated with home visits by SS. SETTINGS: Sixty-eight sub-districts in Bangladesh.

participantsCaregivers of children aged 6-59 months (n 1408) and BRAC's SS (n 201).

resultsHouseholds with older children (0·55; 0·42, 0·72; P < 0·001) and located >300 m from the SS's house (0·67; 0·50, 0·89; P = 0·006) were less likely to have been visited by the SS, whereas those with caregivers who had ≥5 years of schooling (1·53; 1·10, 2·12; P = 0·011) were more likely to have been visited by the SS (adjusted OR; 95 % CI). Households in the catchment area of older SS aged >50 years (0·44; 0·21, 0·90; P = 0·025) were less likely to have been visited by the SS, whereas those with SS who received incentives of >800 BDT (3·00; 1·58, 5·58; P = 0·001) were more likely to have been visited by the SS (adjusted OR; 95 % CI).

conclusionsThe number of home visits is a function of the characteristics of SS, factors that characterize the households they serve and characteristics of their organizational context, particularly to implement home fortification of foods with MNP.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersHouse CallsAdolescentBangladeshChildCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMultilevel AnalysisVolunteersBRACCommunity health workerHome fortificationHome visitSasthya Shebika

Identifiers

PMID31983364
PMCPMC8042574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.