Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31983042›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2020

Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence: Definitions, Applications, and Future Directions.

J Matthew Helm, Andrew M Swiergosz, Heather S Haeberle, Jaret M Karnuta, Jonathan L Schaffer, Viktor E Krebs, Andrew I Spitzer, Prem N Ramkumar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 159 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
159citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

159 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The effects of applying artificial intelligence to triage in the emergency department: A systematic review of prospective studies.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Machine learning used to study risk factors for chronic diseases: A scoping review.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026
    Article

99 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

J Matthew HelmMachine Learning Arthroplasty Laboratory, Cleveland Clinic, 2049 E 100th St., Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Andrew M SwiergoszMachine Learning Arthroplasty Laboratory, Cleveland Clinic, 2049 E 100th St., Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Heather S HaeberleBaylor College of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Houston, TX, USA.
Jaret M KarnutaMachine Learning Arthroplasty Laboratory, Cleveland Clinic, 2049 E 100th St., Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Jonathan L SchafferMachine Learning Arthroplasty Laboratory, Cleveland Clinic, 2049 E 100th St., Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Viktor E KrebsMachine Learning Arthroplasty Laboratory, Cleveland Clinic, 2049 E 100th St., Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Andrew I SpitzerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Prem N RamkumarMachine Learning Arthroplasty Laboratory, Cleveland Clinic, 2049 E 100th St., Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. premramkumar@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWith the unprecedented advancement of data aggregation and deep learning algorithms, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are poised to transform the practice of medicine. The field of orthopedics, in particular, is uniquely suited to harness the power of big data, and in doing so provide critical insight into elevating the many facets of care provided by orthopedic surgeons. The purpose of this review is to critically evaluate the recent and novel literature regarding ML in the field of orthopedics and to address its potential impact on the future of musculoskeletal care. RECENT

findingsRecent literature demonstrates that the incorporation of ML into orthopedics has the potential to elevate patient care through alternative patient-specific payment models, rapidly analyze imaging modalities, and remotely monitor patients. Just as the business of medicine was once considered outside the domain of the orthopedic surgeon, we report evidence that demonstrates these emerging applications of AI warrant ownership, leverage, and application by the orthopedic surgeon to better serve their patients and deliver optimal, value-based care.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceBig dataMachine learningPatient-specific payment modelsRemote patient monitoring systemsValue-based care

Identifiers

PMID31983042
PMCPMC7083992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.