Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31982981›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2020

Radiation risk of central nervous system tumors in the Life Span Study of atomic bomb survivors, 1958-2009.

Alina V Brenner, Hiromi Sugiyama, Dale L Preston, Ritsu Sakata, Benjamin French, Atsuko Sadakane, Elizabeth K Cahoon, Mai Utada, Kiyohiko Mabuchi, Kotaro Ozasa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alina V BrennerRadiation Effects Research Foundation, Epidemiology, 5-2 Hijiyama Park, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 732-0815, Japan. brennera@rerf.or.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8556-3907
Hiromi SugiyamaRadiation Effects Research Foundation, Epidemiology, 5-2 Hijiyama Park, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 732-0815, Japan.
Dale L PrestonHirosoft International, Eureka, CA, USA.
Ritsu SakataRadiation Effects Research Foundation, Epidemiology, 5-2 Hijiyama Park, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 732-0815, Japan.
Benjamin FrenchRadiation Effects Research Foundation, Epidemiology, 5-2 Hijiyama Park, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 732-0815, Japan.
Atsuko SadakaneRadiation Effects Research Foundation, Epidemiology, 5-2 Hijiyama Park, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 732-0815, Japan.
Elizabeth K CahoonDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Mai UtadaRadiation Effects Research Foundation, Epidemiology, 5-2 Hijiyama Park, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 732-0815, Japan.
Kiyohiko MabuchiDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Kotaro OzasaRadiation Effects Research Foundation, Epidemiology, 5-2 Hijiyama Park, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 732-0815, Japan.

Funding

Studies of Populations Exposed to Environmental Sources of RadiationZIACP010132 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI CAHOON, ELIZABETH · 2009 to 2025
$35.2M
NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201400009C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation exposure is among the few factors known to be associated with risk of central nervous system (CNS) tumors. However, the patterns of radiation risk by histological type, sex or age are unclear. We evaluated radiation risks of first primary glioma, meningioma, schwannoma, and other or not otherwise specified (other/NOS) tumors in the Life Span Study cohort of atomic bomb survivors. Cases diagnosed between 1958 and 2009 were ascertained through population-based cancer registries in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. To estimate excess relative risk per Gy (ERR/Gy), we fit rate models using Poisson regression methods. There were 285 CNS tumors (67 gliomas, 107 meningiomas, 49 schwannomas, and 64 other/NOS tumors) among 105,444 individuals with radiation dose estimates to the brain contributing 3.1 million person-years of observation. Based on a simple linear model without effect modification, ERR/Gy was 1.67 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.12 to 5.26) for glioma, 1.82 (95% CI: 0.51 to 4.30) for meningioma, 1.45 (95% CI: - 0.01 to 4.97) for schwannoma, and 1.40 (95% CI: 0.61 to 2.57) for all CNS tumors as a group. For each tumor type, the dose-response was consistent with linearity and appeared to be stronger among males than among females, particularly for meningioma (P = 0.045). There was also evidence that the ERR/Gy for schwannoma decreased with attained age (P = 0.002). More than 60 years after the bombings, radiation risks for CNS tumors continue to be elevated. Further follow-up is necessary to characterize the lifetime risks of specific CNS tumors following radiation exposure.

Indexed as

AdultAtomic Bomb SurvivorsCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsCohort StudiesDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFemaleGliomaHumansJapanLongevityMaleMeningiomaMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Radiation-InducedNeurilemmomaRadiation ExposureAtomic bombsCNS tumorCohort studiesEtiologyRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID31982981
PMCPMC7329623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.