ArticleCurrent microbiology2020
Photobacterium lucens sp. nov., Isolated from a Cultured Shrimp Penaeus vannamei.
Article in Current microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Warming-driven migration of enterotypes mediates host health and disease statuses in ectotherm Litopenaeus vannamei.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Article
- An Update on Novel Taxa and Revised Taxonomic Status of Bacteria (Including Members of the PhylumJournal of clinical microbiology · 2023Review
- Comparative Genomic Analyses of the GenusInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Two bacterial strains were isolated from the hepatopancreas of a cultured shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) in Sinaloa, México. Their partial 16S rRNA gene sequences clustered within those of the genus Photobacterium, showing high similarity to the type strains of Photobacterium angustum and Photobacterium leiognathi, were 87.1% and 97.5%, respectively. Multilocus sequence analysis using eight housekeeping genes (ftsZ, gapA, gyrB, mreB, pyrH, recA, rpoA, topA and 16S rRNA) and phylogenetic analysis with 139 single-copy genes showed that the new strains form an independent branch whole genome sequencing and genomic analyses (average nucleotide identity, average amino acid identity, and in silico DNA-DNA hybridization) produced values well below the thresholds for species delineation with all methods tested. In addition, a phenotypic characterization was performed to support the description and differentiation of the novel strains from related taxa. The results obtained demonstrate that the two strains represent a novel species for which the name Photobacterium lucens sp. nov. is proposed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31982966What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.