Trial reportContraception2020
Computer-assisted motivational interviewing for contraceptive use in women leaving prison: A randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Contraception, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Health Education Initiatives for People Who Have Experienced Prison: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Building an implementation framework to address unmet contraceptive care needs in a carceral setting: a systematic review.Health & justice · 2023Article
- Article
- Reproductive healthcare in prison: A qualitative study of women's experiences and perspectives in Ontario, Canada.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesRates of unintended pregnancies in women with a history of incarceration are high and access to contraception before and after arrest can be limited. Individualized counseling can better prepare women for healthy pregnancy or provide an opportunity for contraceptive education and access within correctional facilities. In this study, we assessed the efficacy of motivational interviewing as an individualized intervention to increase the initiation of contraceptive methods while incarcerated and continuation after release in female inmates who wanted to avoid pregnancy for at least one year after release. STUDY
designWe performed an RCT in a population of incarcerated women who wanted to avoid pregnancy. Women were randomized to either a computer-assisted motivational interviewing intervention group (n = 119) or an educational video with counseling control group. (n = 113). The primary outcome was initiation of a method of birth control prior to release from the correctional facility.
resultsInitiation of contraception was higher in the intervention group (56% vs. 42%, p = 0.03), but this difference was not significant after controlling for number of male partners within the year prior to incarceration. There was no difference between the groups in the rates of pregnancies or STIs or continuation of contraception after release, which was generally low (21%).
conclusionComputer-assisted motivational interviewing did not improve uptake or continuation of contraception in this study. IMPLICATIONS: Periods of incarceration provide an opportunity to offer contraceptive services to women who want to avoid a pregnancy. Motivational interviewing may not be an effective method to affect contraceptive behaviors in this population. Future research should explore the family planning values and preferences of women who become involved with the correctional system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.