Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31982413›Full record

Observational studyGastroenterology2020

Peritoneal Level of CD206 Associates With Mortality and an Inflammatory Macrophage Phenotype in Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis and Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis.

Sven Stengel, Stefanie Quickert, Philipp Lutz, Oluwatomi Ibidapo-Obe, Arndt Steube, Nilay Köse-Vogel, Melina Yarbakht, Philipp A Reuken, Martin Busch, Annette Brandt and 4 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Liver Cirrhosis: The Immunocompromised State.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sven StengelDepartment of Internal Medicine IV (Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Infectious Diseases), Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Stefanie QuickertDepartment of Internal Medicine IV (Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Infectious Diseases), Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Philipp LutzDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; German Center for Infection Research, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Oluwatomi Ibidapo-ObeDepartment of Internal Medicine IV (Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Infectious Diseases), Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Arndt SteubeDepartment of Internal Medicine IV (Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Infectious Diseases), Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Nilay Köse-VogelDepartment of Internal Medicine IV (Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Infectious Diseases), Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Melina YarbakhtDepartment of Internal Medicine IV (Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Infectious Diseases), Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; The Integrated Research and Treatment Center for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Philipp A ReukenDepartment of Internal Medicine IV (Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Infectious Diseases), Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Martin BuschDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Annette BrandtDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, R.F. Molecular Nutritional Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ina BergheimDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, R.F. Molecular Nutritional Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Sachin D DeshmukhThe Integrated Research and Treatment Center for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Andreas StallmachDepartment of Internal Medicine IV (Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Infectious Diseases), Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Tony BrunsDepartment of Internal Medicine IV (Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Infectious Diseases), Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; The Integrated Research and Treatment Center for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Aachen, Germany. Electronic address: tbruns@ukaachen.de.
Jena University Hospital · DEUniversity of Vienna · ATRWTH Aachen University · DEUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsPeritoneal macrophages (PMs) regulate inflammation and control bacterial infections in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. We aimed to characterize PMs and associate their activation with outcomes of patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP).

methodsWe isolated PMs from ascites samples of 66 patients with decompensated cirrhosis (19 with SBP) and analyzed them by flow cytometry, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, functional analysis, and RNA microarrays. We used ascites samples of a separate cohort of 111 patients with decompensated cirrhosis (67 with SBP) and quantified the soluble form of the mannose receptor (CD206) and tumor necrosis factor by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (test cohort). We performed logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with 90-day mortality. We validated our findings using data from 71 patients with cirrhosis and SBP. Data from 14 patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis for end-stage renal disease but without cirrhosis were included as controls.

resultsWe used surface levels of CD206 to identify subsets of large PMs (LPM) and small PMs (SPM), which differed in granularity and maturation markers, in ascites samples from patients with cirrhosis. LPMs vs SPMs from patients with cirrhosis had different transcriptomes; we identified more than 4000 genes that were differentially regulated in LPMs vs SPMs, including those that regulate the cycle, metabolism, self-renewal, and immune cell signaling. LPMs had an inflammatory phenotype, were less susceptible to tolerance induction, and released more tumor necrosis factor than SPMs. LPMs from patients with cirrhosis produced more inflammatory cytokines than LPMs from controls. Activation of PMs by Toll-like receptor agonists and live bacteria altered levels of CD206 on the surface of LPMs and release of soluble CD206. Analysis of serial ascites fluid from patients with SBP revealed loss of LPMs in the early phase of SBP, but levels increased after treatment. In the test and validation cohorts, patients with SBP and higher concentrations of soluble CD206 in ascites fluid (>0.53 mg/L) were less likely to survive for 90 days than those with lower levels.

conclusionsSurface level of CD206 can be used to identify mature, resident, inflammatory PMs in patients with cirrhosis. Soluble CD206 is released from activated LPMs and increased concentrations in patients with cirrhosis and SBP indicate reduced odds of surviving for 90 days.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnimalsAscitic FluidBacterial InfectionsBiomarkersCells, CulturedDisease Models, AnimalEnd Stage Liver DiseaseFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLiver CirrhosisMacrophages, PeritonealMaleMembrane GlycoproteinsBiomarkersMembrane GlycoproteinsMRC1 protein, humanReceptors, ImmunologicBacterial InfectionBiomarkerPrognostic FactorRisk of Death

Identifiers

PMID31982413
OpenAlexW3002630409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.