Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31981227›Full record

Trial reportHeadache2020

A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Impact of Motivational Interviewing on Initiating Behavioral Therapy for Migraine.

Mia T Minen, Gabriella Sahyoun, Ariana Gopal, Valeriya Levitan, Elizabeth Pirraglia, Naomi M Simon, Audrey Halpern

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Headache, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mia T MinenDepartment of Neurology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Gabriella SahyounDepartment of Neuroscience, Barnard College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Ariana GopalDepartment of Biology, The City College of New York, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Valeriya LevitanDepartment of Neurology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Elizabeth PirragliaDepartment of Population, Biostatistics Division, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Naomi M SimonDepartment of Psychiatry, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Audrey HalpernDepartment of Neurology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
NYU Langone Health · USCity University of New York · USColumbia University · US

Funding

Progressive Muscle Relaxation for Chronic Pain in an Acute Care SettingK23AT009706 · NCCIH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MINEN, MIA · 2018 to 2022
$923k
International Headache AcademyNCCIH NIH HHS K23 AT009706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRelaxation, biofeedback, and cognitive behavioral therapy are evidence-based behavioral therapies for migraine. Despite such efficacy, research shows that only about half of patients initiate behavioral therapy recommended by their headache specialists.

objectiveMotivational interviewing (MI) is a widely used method to help patients explore and overcome ambivalence to enact positive life changes. We tested the hypothesis that telephone-based MI would improve initiation, scheduling, and attending behavioral therapy for migraine.

methodsSingle-blind randomized controlled trial comparing telephone-based MI to treatment as usual (TAU). Participants were recruited during their appointments with headache specialists at two sites of a New York City medical center. INCLUSION CRITERIA: ages from 16 to 80, migraine diagnosis by United Council of Neurologic Subspecialty fellowship trained and/or certified headache specialist, and referral for behavioral therapy for prevention in the appointment of recruitment. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: having done behavioral therapy for migraine in the past year. Participants in the MI group received up to 5 MI calls. TAU participants were called after 3 months for general follow-up data. The prespecified primary outcome was scheduling a behavioral therapy appointment, and secondary outcomes were initiating and attending a behavioral therapy appointment.

results76 patients were enrolled and randomized (MI = 36, TAU = 40). At baseline, the mean number of headache days was 12.0 ± 9.0. Self-reported anxiety was present for 36/52 (69.2%) and depression for 30/52 (57.7%). Follow-up assessments were completed for 77.6% (59/76, MI = 32, TAU = 27). The mean number of MI calls per participant was 2.69 ± 1.56 [0 to 5]. There was a greater likelihood of those in the MI group to initiating an appointment (22/32, 68.8% vs 11/27, 40.7%, P = .0309). There were no differences in appointment scheduling or attendance. Reasons stated for not initiating behavioral therapy were lack of time, lack of insurance/funding, prioritizing other treatments, and travel plans.

conclusionsBrief telephone-based MI may improve rates of initiation of behavioral therapy for migraine, but other barriers appear to lessen the impact on scheduling and attending behavioral therapy appointments.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyMotivational InterviewingOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient Acceptance of Health CareAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedMigraine DisordersPatient CompliancePilot Projectsadherencebehavioral therapybiofeedbackcognitive behavioral therapyprogressive muscle relaxation

Identifiers

PMID31981227
PMCPMC7754247
OpenAlexW3001785291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.