Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31981135›Full record

ArticleApplied health economics and health policy2020

Promoting HIV Testing by Men: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Elicit Preferences and Predict Uptake of Community-based Testing in Uganda.

Elisabeth M Schaffer, Juan Marcos Gonzalez, Stephanie B Wheeler, Dalsone Kwarisiima, Gabriel Chamie, Harsha Thirumurthy

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied health economics and health policy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02890459 (Innovative Incentive Strategies for Sustainable HIV Testing and Antiretroviral Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02890459 nacompletednot on this map

Innovative Incentive Strategies for Sustainable HIV Testing and Antiretroviral Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2016 to 2020Enrolled3,580ConditionsHIV/AIDSArmsPrize incentive - Low, Prize incentive - High, Escalating payment incentive, Travel Voucher, Standard care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elisabeth M SchafferData Science to Patient Value, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA. Elisabeth.Schaffer@CUAnschutz.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5193-7344
Juan Marcos GonzalezDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Stephanie B WheelerDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Dalsone KwarisiimaMakerere University Joint AIDS Program, Kampala, Uganda.
Gabriel ChamieDivision of HIV, Infectious Diseases, and Global Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Harsha ThirumurthyDepartment of Medical Ethics & Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

Virology, Immunology, and Microbiology CoreP30AI050410 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVID M. MARGOLIS · 2001 to 2026
$76.9M
Innovative incentive strategies for sustainable HIV testing and linkage to careR01MH105254 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CHAMIE, GABRIEL, THIRUMURTHY, HARSHA · 2015 to 2019
$3.0M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050410NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH105254
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesHIV testing is essential to access HIV treatment and care and plays a critical role in preventing transmission. Despite this, testing coverage is low among men in sub-Saharan Africa. Community-based testing has demonstrated potential to expand male testing coverage, yet scant evidence reveals how community-based services can be designed to optimize testing uptake. We conducted a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to elicit preferences and predict uptake of community-based testing by men in Uganda.

methodsHypothetical choices between alternative community-based testing services and the option to opt-out of testing were presented to a random, population-based sample of 203 adult male residents. The testing alternatives varied by service delivery model (community health campaign, counselor-administered home-based testing, distribution of HIV self-test kits at local pharmacies), availability of multi-disease testing, access to antiretroviral therapy (ART), and provision of a US$0.85 incentive. We estimated preferences using a random parameters logit model and explored whether preferences varied by participant characteristics through subgroup analyses. We simulated uptake when a single and when two community-based testing services are made available, using reference values of observed uptake to calibrate predictions.

resultsThe share of the adult male population predicted to test for HIV ranged from 0.15 to 0.91 when a single community-based testing service is made available and from 0.50 to 0.96 when two community-based services are provided concurrently. ART access was the strongest driver of choices (relative importance [RI] = 3.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.74-4.29), followed by the service delivery model (RI = 1.27, 95% CI 0.72-1.82) and availability of multi-disease testing (RI = 1.27, 95% CI 0.09-2.45). A US$0.85 incentive had the least yet still significant influence on choices (RI = 0.77, 95% CI 0.06-1.49). Men who perceived their risk of having HIV to be relatively elevated had higher predicted uptake of HIV self-test kits at local pharmacies, as did young adult men compared to men aged ≥ 30 years. Men who earned ≤ the daily median income had higher predicted uptake of all community-based testing services versus men who earned above the daily median income.

conclusionSubstantial opportunity exists to optimize the delivery of HIV testing to expand uptake by men; using an innovative DCE, we deliver timely, actionable guidance for promoting community-based testing by men in Uganda. We advance the stated preference literature methodologically by describing how we constructed and evaluated a pragmatic experimental design, used interaction terms to conduct subgroup analyses, and harnessed participant-specific preference estimates to predict and calibrate testing uptake.

Indexed as

Community NetworksHealth PromotionHIV TestingPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdolescentAdultHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, EconometricSurveys and QuestionnairesUgandaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31981135
PMCPMC7255957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.