Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31981105›Full record

Observational studyAdvances in therapy2020

SABINA: An Overview of Short-Acting β

Christer Janson, Andrew Menzies-Gow, Cassandra Nan, Javier Nuevo, Alberto Papi, Jennifer K Quint, Santiago Quirce, Claus F Vogelmeier

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Advances in therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 142 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Global under- and overprescribing of drugs-a scoping review.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Optimizing adherence to medication to improve outcomes in asthma.Current opinion in pulmonary medicine · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Christer JansonDepartment of Medical Sciences: Respiratory, Allergy and Sleep Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Andrew Menzies-GowLung Division, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.
Cassandra NanBiopharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Javier NuevoBiopharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Serrano Galvache 56, 28033, Madrid, Spain. Javier.Nuevo@astrazeneca.com.
Alberto PapiDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Jennifer K QuintRespiratory Epidemiology, Occupational Medicine and Public Health, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Santiago QuirceDepartment of Allergy, La Paz University Hospital, and CIBER of Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain.
Claus F VogelmeierDepartment of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University Medical Center Giessen and Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany.
AstraZeneca (Spain) · ESAstraZeneca (Sweden) · SEGerman Center for Lung Research · DEHospital Universitario La Paz · ESImperial College London · GBRoyal Brompton Hospital · GBUniversity of Ferrara · ITUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGlobally, individuals with asthma tend to overrely on short-acting β

methodsPrescription and/or dispensing data during 2006-2017 from electronic medical records and/or national patient registries in the United Kingdom (UK), Germany, Italy, Spain, and Sweden were analyzed. Individuals aged at least 12 years old with a current asthma diagnosis and no other chronic respiratory conditions were included. Asthma treatment step and severity were based on treatment guidelines in use in each individual country. The proportion of individuals prescribed SABA was measured during a 12-month period. SABA overuse was defined as at least three SABA canisters per year.

resultsMore than one million individuals with asthma were included across five European countries. Overall, the majority of individuals were over 45 years of age, except in Sweden (mean age 27.6 years) where individuals aged over 45 years were excluded to avoid a potential chronic obstructive pulmonary disease co-diagnosis. The study population was predominantly female (55-64%), except in the UK (46%). The prevalence of SABA overuse was 9% in Italy, 16% in Germany, 29% in Spain, 30% in Sweden, and 38% in the UK. In the UK, SABA overuse was greater in individuals with moderate-to-severe asthma versus individuals with mild asthma (58% versus 27%, respectively), while SABA overuse was similar in individuals with both mild (9-32%) and moderate-to-severe (8-31%) asthma in the other European countries.

conclusionsThe findings of this study from the SABINA program show that SABA overuse (at least three canisters per year) is common across Europe, despite the different healthcare and reimbursement policies of each country.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdolescentAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsAdultAgedAsthmaDrug Therapy, CombinationElectronic Health RecordsEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsEuropeOverreliancePrescriptionPublic healthShort-acting β2-agonist

Identifiers

PMID31981105
PMCPMC7089727
OpenAlexW3002844542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.