Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31981078›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2020

SEOM clinical guidelines for cervical cancer (2019).

A de Juan, A Redondo, M J Rubio, Y García, J Cueva, L Gaba, A Yubero, J Alarcón, C Maximiano, A Oaknin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Exploring the Anticancer Activity ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Promising predictive molecular biomarkers for cervical cancer (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Assessing the methodological strengths and limitations of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) guidelines: a critical appraisal using AGREE II and AGREE-REX tool.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. 2019 SEOM guidelines (the end of a decade).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

A de JuanMedical Oncology Department, H. Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
A RedondoMedical Oncology Department, H. Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
M J RubioMedical Oncology Department, H. Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain.
Y GarcíaMedical Oncology Department, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí I3PT, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Spain, Sabadell, Spain.
J CuevaMedical Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Santiago, Spain.
L GabaMedical Oncology Department, H. Clinic i Provincial de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
A YuberoMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain.
J AlarcónMedical Oncology Department, H. Universitari Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
C MaximianoMedical Oncology Department, H. Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
A OakninMedical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. aoaknin@vhio.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer (CC) is the fourth most common cancer in women worldwide, strongly linked to high-risk human papilloma virus infection. In high-income countries, the screening programs have dramatically decreased the incidence of CC; however, the lack of accessibility to them in developing countries makes CC an important cause of mortality. Clinical stage is the most relevant prognostic factor in CC. The new FIGO staging system published in 2018 is more accurate than the previous one since it takes into account the lymph node status. In early stages, the primary treatment is surgery-with some concerns recently raised regarding minimally invasive surgery because it might decrease survival-or radiotherapy, whereas concomitant chemo-radiotherapy is the conventional approach in locally advanced stages. For recurrent or metastatic CC, the combination of chemotherapy plus bevacizumab is the preferred therapy. Immunotherapy approach based on checkpoint inhibitors is evolving as the election therapy following failure to platinum therapy.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMedical OncologyPractice Guidelines as TopicSocieties, MedicalUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCervical cancerStagingTreatment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.