Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31981076›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology2020

Use of a Porcine Model to Evaluate the Risks and Benefits of Vasopressors in Propranolol Poisoning.

Jon B Cole, Justin N Corcoran, Kristin M Engebretsen, Samuel J Stellpflug

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Additional Considerations for Persistent Hyperinsulinemia.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jon B ColeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, 701 Park Ave, Mail Code RL.240, Minneapolis, MN, 55415, USA. jon.cole@hcmed.org.ORCID 0000-0002-7714-8826
Justin N CorcoranMinnesota Poison Control System, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Kristin M EngebretsenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Regions Hospital, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Samuel J StellpflugMinnesota Poison Control System, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Regions Hospital · USUniversity of Minnesota System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVasopressors are a commonly used treatment in beta-blocker poisoning despite evidence they may be ineffective or harmful. The primary objective of the present study is to use previously collected data from two prior studies (high-dose insulin (HDI) versus vasopressin + epinephrine and a placebo-controlled HDI study) to compare survival between vasopressin + epinephrine and placebo. Secondary outcomes included a comparison with HDI as well as comparisons with hemodynamic parameters, including mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac output (CO), heart rate (HR), and systemic vascular resistance (SVR).

methodsCardiogenic shock was induced in healthy pigs with a bolus of 0.5 mg/kg of intravenous propranolol followed by an infusion of 0.25 mg/kg/minute until the point of toxicity, defined as (0.75 × initial HR × initial MAP), at which point the infusion was reduced to 0.125 mg/kg/minute for 240 (vasopressin + epinephrine or HDI) or 360 minutes (placebo) or until death.

resultsSurvival was significantly lower in pigs receiving vasopressin + epinephrine (0%, 0/5) than in pigs receiving placebo (50%, 2/4) (p < 0.01). Survival was significantly higher with HDI compared with both groups (100%, 5/5) (p < 0.01). All vasopressin + epinephrine pigs died within 100 minutes after reaching toxicity. Over the course of the resuscitation, we observed a statistically significant steady decrease in CO and HR in the vasopressin + epinephrine group compared with placebo (p < 0.01). In contrast, we observed a statistically significant change in MAP and SVR that followed a parabolic arc, with MAP and SVR rising significantly initially in the vasopressin + epinephrine group then rapidly falling until death (p < 0.01).

conclusionsMortality was higher with vasopressors compared with placebo in this porcine model of propranolol poisoning. Further studies are warranted to define the optimal timing and role of vasopressors in beta-blocker poisoning.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsPropranololAnimalsCardiotoxicityDisease Models, AnimalDrug Administration ScheduleEpinephrineHemodynamicsRisk AssessmentShock, CardiogenicSus scrofaTime FactorsVasoconstrictor AgentsVasopressinsAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsEpinephrinePropranololVasoconstrictor AgentsVasopressinsBeta-blockersOverdosePoisoningPropranololVasopressors

Identifiers

PMID31981076
PMCPMC7099112
OpenAlexW3002891049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.