Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31980996›Full record

ArticleTargeted oncology2020

Genetic Profiling of Advanced Melanoma: Candidate Mutations for Predicting Sensitivity and Resistance to Targeted Therapy.

Magdalena Olbryt, Wojciech Pigłowski, Marcin Rajczykowski, Aleksandra Pfeifer, Sebastian Student, Anna Fiszer-Kierzkowska

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Targeted oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Rac1, A Potential Target for Tumor Therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Cancers · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Magdalena OlbrytCenter for Translational Research and Molecular Biology of Cancer, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute, Oncology Center Gliwice Branch, Wybrzeze Armii Krajowej 15, Gliwice, Poland. Magdalena.Olbryt@io.gliwice.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9961-6427
Wojciech PigłowskiCenter for Translational Research and Molecular Biology of Cancer, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute, Oncology Center Gliwice Branch, Wybrzeze Armii Krajowej 15, Gliwice, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9727-7318
Marcin RajczykowskiII Clinic of Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute, Oncology Center Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland.
Aleksandra PfeiferDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute, Oncology Center Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0189-9711
Sebastian StudentDepartment of Systems Biology and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 16, Gliwice, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1812-5496
Anna Fiszer-KierzkowskaCenter for Translational Research and Molecular Biology of Cancer, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute, Oncology Center Gliwice Branch, Wybrzeze Armii Krajowej 15, Gliwice, Poland.
The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLSilesian University of Technology · PL

Funding

National Science Centre, Poland 2018/02/X/NZ7/00606
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMolecularly targeted therapy has revolutionized the treatment of advanced melanoma. However, despite its high efficiency, a majority of patients experience relapse within 1 year of treatment because of acquired resistance, and approximately 10-25% patients gain no benefit from these agents owing to intrinsic resistance. This is mainly caused by the genetic heterogeneity of melanoma cells.

objectiveWe aimed to validate the predictive significance of selected genes in advanced melanoma patients before treatment with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. PATIENTS AND

methodsArchival DNA derived from 37 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded pre-treatment advanced melanoma samples of patients treated with targeted therapy was used for next-generation sequencing analysis using the Ion Torrent platform. The AmpliSeq Custom Panel comprised coding sequences or hot spots of 23 melanoma genes: ATM, BRAF, CDK4, CDKN2A, CTNNB1, EGFR, HOXD8, HRAS, IDH1, KIT, KRAS, MAP3K8, MAP2K1, MAP2K2, MITF, MYC, NF1, NRAS, PAX5, PIK3R1, PTEN, RAC1, and RB1. The sequences were evaluated for genomic alterations and further validated using Sanger sequencing.

resultsOur analysis revealed non-BRAF genetic alterations in 28 out of 37 samples (75.7%). Genetic changes were identified in PTEN, CDK4, CDKN2A, CTNNB1, EGFR, HOXD8, HRAS, KIT, MAP2K1, MAP2K2, MITF, MYC, NF1, PAX5, RAC1, and RB1. Fifteen known pathogenic mutations (single nucleotide variants or indels) and 11 variants of unknown significance were detected. Statistical analysis revealed an association between the presence of pathogenic mutations and time to progression during treatment with combination therapy.

conclusionsPathogenic mutations identified by gene panel sequencing have potential predictive value for targeted therapy of melanoma and are worth further validation in a larger series of cases. The role of some known mutations (e.g. CDK4

Indexed as

FemaleGenetic ProfileHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedMutation

Identifiers

PMID31980996
PMCPMC7028806
OpenAlexW3000984240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.