ArticleTargeted oncology2020
Genetic Profiling of Advanced Melanoma: Candidate Mutations for Predicting Sensitivity and Resistance to Targeted Therapy.
Article in Targeted oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Harnessing Proteogenomics to Advance Precision Oncology: From Melanoma and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Perspective.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Melanoma treatment in the era of nanotechnology and precision medicine.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Determinants of resistance and response to melanoma therapy.Nature cancer · 2024Review
- Alantolactone enhances the sensitivity of melanoma to MAPK pathway inhibitors by targeting inhibition of STAT3 activation and down-regulating stem cell markers.Cancer cell international · 2024Article
- A multiparameter liquid biopsy approach allows to track melanoma dynamics and identify early treatment resistance.NPJ precision oncology · 2024Article
- Mechanisms of Melanoma Progression and Treatment Resistance: Role of Cancer Stem-like Cells.Cancers · 2024Review
- The OSUMMER lines: A series of ultraviolet-accelerated NRAS-mutant mouse melanoma cell lines syngeneic to C57BL/6.Pigment cell & melanoma research · 2023Article
- Article
- Potential Biomarkers of Skin Melanoma Resistance to Targeted Therapy-Present State and Perspectives.Cancers · 2022Review
- Upregulation of the novel lncRNA U731166 is associated with migration, invasion and vemurafenib resistance in melanoma.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2022Article
- ILP-2: A New Bane and Therapeutic Target for Human Cancers.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T Cell Therapy for Metastatic Melanoma: Challenges and Road Ahead.Cells · 2021Review
- Resistance to Targeted Therapy and RASSF1A Loss in Melanoma: What Are We Missing?International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Rac1, A Potential Target for Tumor Therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- A Melanoma-Tailored Next-Generation Sequencing Panel Coupled with a Comprehensive Analysis to Improve Routine Melanoma Genotyping.Targeted oncology · 2020Article
- Review
- Article
- Circulating Tumor DNA Correlates with Outcome in Metastatic Melanoma Treated by BRAF and MEK Inhibitors - Results of a Prospective Biomarker Study.OncoTargets and therapy · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMolecularly targeted therapy has revolutionized the treatment of advanced melanoma. However, despite its high efficiency, a majority of patients experience relapse within 1 year of treatment because of acquired resistance, and approximately 10-25% patients gain no benefit from these agents owing to intrinsic resistance. This is mainly caused by the genetic heterogeneity of melanoma cells.
objectiveWe aimed to validate the predictive significance of selected genes in advanced melanoma patients before treatment with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. PATIENTS AND
methodsArchival DNA derived from 37 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded pre-treatment advanced melanoma samples of patients treated with targeted therapy was used for next-generation sequencing analysis using the Ion Torrent platform. The AmpliSeq Custom Panel comprised coding sequences or hot spots of 23 melanoma genes: ATM, BRAF, CDK4, CDKN2A, CTNNB1, EGFR, HOXD8, HRAS, IDH1, KIT, KRAS, MAP3K8, MAP2K1, MAP2K2, MITF, MYC, NF1, NRAS, PAX5, PIK3R1, PTEN, RAC1, and RB1. The sequences were evaluated for genomic alterations and further validated using Sanger sequencing.
resultsOur analysis revealed non-BRAF genetic alterations in 28 out of 37 samples (75.7%). Genetic changes were identified in PTEN, CDK4, CDKN2A, CTNNB1, EGFR, HOXD8, HRAS, KIT, MAP2K1, MAP2K2, MITF, MYC, NF1, PAX5, RAC1, and RB1. Fifteen known pathogenic mutations (single nucleotide variants or indels) and 11 variants of unknown significance were detected. Statistical analysis revealed an association between the presence of pathogenic mutations and time to progression during treatment with combination therapy.
conclusionsPathogenic mutations identified by gene panel sequencing have potential predictive value for targeted therapy of melanoma and are worth further validation in a larger series of cases. The role of some known mutations (e.g. CDK4
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.