Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31980974›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2021

Structural volumetry in NPH diagnostics and treatment-future or dead end?

Aleš Vlasák, Petr Skalický, Arnošt Mládek, Jiří Vrána, Vladimír Beneš, Ondřej Bradáč

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aleš VlasákDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, Military University Hospital and Charles University, First Medical Faculty, U Vojenské nemocnice 1200/1, 162 00, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Petr SkalickýDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, Military University Hospital and Charles University, First Medical Faculty, U Vojenské nemocnice 1200/1, 162 00, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Arnošt MládekDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, Military University Hospital and Charles University, First Medical Faculty, U Vojenské nemocnice 1200/1, 162 00, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Jiří VránaDepartment of Radiology, Military University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Vladimír BenešDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, Military University Hospital and Charles University, First Medical Faculty, U Vojenské nemocnice 1200/1, 162 00, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Ondřej BradáčDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, Military University Hospital and Charles University, First Medical Faculty, U Vojenské nemocnice 1200/1, 162 00, Prague 6, Czech Republic. ondrej.bradac@uvn.cz.
Charles University · CZMilitary University Hospital Prague · CZ

Funding

Czech Ministry of Defence MO1012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess automated volumetric analysis as a potential presurgical diagnostic tool or as a method to potentially shed light on normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) pathophysiology. MRI imaging according to our protocol was performed in 29 NPH patients, 45 non-NPH (but suspected) patients and 15 controls. Twenty patients underwent a second MRI 3 months after ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt surgery. All structures relevant to NPH diagnosis were automatically segmented using commercial software. The results were subsequently tested using ANOVA analysis. Significant differences in the volumes of the corpus callosum, left hippocampus, internal globus pallidus, grey and white matter and ventricular volumes were observed between NPH group and healthy controls. However, the differences between NPH and non-NPH groups were non-significant. Three months after, VP shunt insertion decreased ventricular volume was the only clearly significant result (p value 0.0001). Even though a detailed volumetric study shows several significant differences, volumetric analysis as a standalone method does not provide a simple diagnostic biomarker, nor does it shed a light on an unknown NPH aetiology.

Indexed as

AgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansHydrocephalus, Normal PressureMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedOrgan SizeTreatment OutcomeVentriculoperitoneal ShuntDiagnostic proceduresMRINormal pressure hydrocephalusShunt procedureStructural volumetry

Identifiers

PMID31980974
OpenAlexW3003068461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.