Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31980969›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2020

Brain activity underlying face and face pareidolia processing: an ERP study.

Gülsüm Akdeniz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A limited visual search advantage for illusory faces.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gülsüm AkdenizDepartment of Neuroscience, Department of Biophysics, Electroneurophysiology Laboratory, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Medicine Faculty, and Yenimahalle Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. gakdeniz@ybu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9411-3318

Funding

Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University 2656
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeFace pareidolia is described as an interpretation of any unrelated object seen for the first time as a face. It is still unclear how to face pareidolia is processed. In this study, the neural basis of face and face pareidolia processing was investigated through recording event-related potentials (ERPs).

methodsThe ERPs were recorded from 35 right-handed and healthy participants in response to faces and face pareidolia. Amplitudes and latencies of N170, vertex-positive potential (VPP), and N250 components were analyzed, and current source density (CSD) maps relevant to these components were obtained.

resultsN170 response was earlier and larger in response to faces compared to face pareidolias. VPP is also evoked earlier in response to faces as in the case of N170; however, the VPP amplitude was larger for face pareidolias than for faces. Statistical analyses did not reveal any differences between faces and face pareidolias in terms of N250 component.

conclusionThe results indicated that faces and face pareidolias are processed in the early stages of visual perception. In addition, the N250 component does not reflect the neural processing of faces and face pareidolias.

Indexed as

FaceAdultCerebral CortexElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFacial RecognitionFemaleHumansMalePattern Recognition, VisualPerceptual DisordersTime FactorsYoung AdultFace processingN170Pareidolia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.