Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31980967›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2020

Breast cancer tumor histopathology, stage at presentation, and treatment in the extremes of age.

Jennifer K Plichta, Samantha M Thomas, Rebecca Vernon, Oluwadamilola M Fayanju, Laura H Rosenberger, Terry Hyslop, E Shelley Hwang, Rachel A Greenup

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer K PlichtaDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, 1353, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. Jennifer.Plichta@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7411-0558
Samantha M ThomasDuke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Rebecca VernonDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, 1353, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Oluwadamilola M FayanjuDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, 1353, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Laura H RosenbergerDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, 1353, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Terry HyslopDuke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
E Shelley HwangDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, 1353, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Rachel A GreenupDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, 1353, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University · US

Funding

Women's Cancer Research ProgramP30CA014236 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DONNA NIEDZWIECKI · 1985 to 2026
$174.8M
Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's HealthK12HD043446 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI AMUNDSEN, CINDY · 2002 to 2023
$9.6M
Using Modifiable Risk Factors to Predict Inferior Care and Survival after Breast Cancer Diagnosis: A Novel Approach to Addressing Health DisparitiesK08CA241390 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FAYANJU, OLUWADAMILOLA M. · 2019 to 2023
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA241390NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014236NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD043446NIH HHS 1K08CA241390NIH HHS K12HD043446-11NIH HHS P30-CA014236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven presumed differences in disease severity between young (≤ 45 years) and elderly (≥ 75 years) women with breast cancer, we sought to compare tumor histopathology, stage at presentation, patterns of care, and survival at the extremes of age.

methodsAdults with stages 0-IV breast cancer in the National Cancer Database (2004-2015) were categorized by age (18-45 years, 46-74 years, ≥ 75 years) and compared. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to visualize unadjusted overall survival (OS). A Cox proportional-hazards model was used to estimate the effect of age group, including adjustment for tumor subtype [hormone receptor [HR]+/HER2-, HER2+, triple-negative (TN)].

resultsOf the 1,201,252 patients identified, 13% were ≤ 45 years and 17.5% were ≥ 75 years. Women ≤ 45 years were more likely to have higher pT/N stages and grade 3 disease compared to older patients; however, rates of de novo cM1 disease were comparable (3.7% vs 3.5%). HER2+ and TN tumors were more common in those ≤ 45 years (HER2+ : 18.6% vs 9.2%; TN: 14.9% vs 8.2%), while HR+/HER2- tumors were more likely in women ≥ 75 years (69.3% vs 51.3%) (all p < 0.001). Younger patients were more likely to undergo mastectomy vs lumpectomy (56% vs 34%), and receive chemotherapy (65.8% vs 10.2%) and radiation (56.2% vs 39.5%). After adjustment, OS was worse in older patients (older HR 2.94, CI 2.86-3.03).

conclusionsHigh-risk tumor subtypes and comprehensive multimodal treatment remain significantly more common among younger women (≤ 45 years) with breast cancer, yet, elderly women are similarly diagnosed with incurable de novo metastatic disease. Tailored screening and treatment strategies are critical to prevent age-related disparities in breast cancer care.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyComorbidityDisease ManagementFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRegistriesSocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultBiomarkers, TumorAge extremesBreast cancerElderlyYoung women

Identifiers

PMID31980967
PMCPMC7066434
OpenAlexW3001304630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.