Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31980936›Full record

ArticleOecologia2020

Experimental study of the effect of preen oil against feather bacteria in passerine birds.

Grete Alt, Marko Mägi, Jaanis Lodjak, Raivo Mänd

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Biosafe Management ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Grete AltDepartment of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, 46 Vanemuise Street, 51003, Tartu, Estonia.
Marko MägiDepartment of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, 46 Vanemuise Street, 51003, Tartu, Estonia. marko.magi@ut.ee.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0736-5638
Jaanis LodjakDepartment of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, 46 Vanemuise Street, 51003, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8089-948X
Raivo MändDepartment of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, 46 Vanemuise Street, 51003, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0878-1775
University of Tartu · EE

Funding

FP7 Ideas: European Research Council IUT34-8FP7 Ideas: European Research Council PUTJD700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Avian plumage harbors various pathogens such as feather-degrading bacteria, which have the potential to reduce host fitness. A growing body of evidence suggests that the secretion of the uropygial gland of birds-preen oil-acts as one of the first lines of defence against harmful bacteria. However, previous studies on the antimicrobial impact of preen oil have yielded controversial results. The impact of preen oil on bacterial densities of feathers was experimentally investigated in two passerine species: great tits Parus major and pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca. More specifically, we tested whether the antibacterial effect of the preen oil secreted by the same individual differs from that of the preen oil originating from the gland of other species. In the laboratory, ventral feathers were treated with preen oil from (1) an individual's own gland, (2) from the gland of another passerine species, or (3) from the gland of a phylogenetically distant bird species. We detected a significant antibacterial effect of preen oil on bacteria that were attached to feathers, though the effect did not depend on whether the oil originated from the individual's own gland or from the gland of another bird species. However, treatment with preen oil suppressed the density of bacteria more in the pied flycatcher than in the great tit. This is the first study providing experimental evidence that preen oil represents an important antimicrobial mechanism against those plumage bacteria that are attached to feathers.

Indexed as

FeathersPasseriformesAnimalsBacteriaGroomingSebaceous GlandsAntimicrobial effectFeather bacteriaGreat titParasitismPied flycatcherUropygial gland

Identifiers

PMID31980936
OpenAlexW3003111937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.