Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31980884›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2020

Tolerability of facial electrostimulation in healthy adults and patients with facial synkinesis.

Gerd Fabian Volk, Jovanna Thielker, Martin Christian Möller, Daniela Majcher, Valeria Mastryukova, Carolin Susann Altmann, Christian Dobel, Orlando Guntinas-Lichius

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Continual rehabilitation motivation of patients with postparalytic facial nerve syndrome.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Can MRI quantify the volume changes of denervated facial muscles?European journal of translational myology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gerd Fabian VolkDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Jovanna ThielkerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Martin Christian MöllerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Daniela MajcherDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Valeria MastryukovaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Carolin Susann AltmannDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Christian DobelDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Orlando Guntinas-LichiusDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany. orlando.guntinas@med.uni-jena.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9671-0784
Jena University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate optimal stimulation parameters with regard to discomfort and tolerability for transcutaneous electrostimulation of facial muscles in healthy participants and patients with postparetic facial synkinesis.

methodsTwo prospective studies were performed. First, single pulse monophasic stimulation with rectangular pulses was compared to triangular pulses in 48 healthy controls. Second, 30 healthy controls were compared to 30 patients with postparetic facial synkinesis with rectangular pulse form. Motor twitch threshold, tolerability threshold, and discomfort were assessed using a numeric rating scale at both thresholds.

resultsDiscomfort at motor threshold was significantly lower for rectangular than for triangular pulses. Average motor and tolerability thresholds were higher for patients than for healthy participants. Discomfort at motor threshold was significantly lower for healthy controls compared to patients. Major side effects were not seen.

conclusionsSurface electrostimulation for selective functional and tolerable facial muscle contractions in patients with postparetic facial synkinesis is feasible.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyFacial ParalysisSynkinesisAdultFacial MusclesHumansProspective StudiesElectrostimulationFacial movementsFacial palsyfacial paralysisMimetic muscles

Identifiers

PMID31980884
PMCPMC7072059
OpenAlexW3000893518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.