Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31980837›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2020

Genome-wide introgression from a bread wheat × Lophopyrum elongatum amphiploid into wheat.

Jiale Xu, Le Wang, Karin R Deal, Tingting Zhu, Ramesh K Ramasamy, Ming-Cheng Luo, Julia Malvick, Frank M You, Patrick E McGuire, Jan Dvorak

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Introgression of perennial growth habit from Lophopyrum elongatum into wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jiale XuDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Le WangDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Karin R DealDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Tingting ZhuDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Ramesh K RamasamyDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Ming-Cheng LuoDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Julia MalvickVeterinary Genetics Laboratory, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Frank M YouOttawa Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0C6, Canada.
Patrick E McGuireDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Jan DvorakDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. jdvorak@ucdavis.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0427-6528
University of California, Davis · USAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada · CACarnegie Department of Plant Biology · US

Funding

Gates Foundation-US NSF BREAD Program IOS-1212591NIFA Hatch Program 1002302USDA-ARS/USWBSI 58-2090-8-071U.S. Department of Agriculture 58-2090-8-071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageWe introgressed wheatgrass germplasm from the octoploid amphiploid Triticum aestivum× Lophopyrum elongatum into wheat by manipulating the wheat Ph1 gene and discovered and characterized 130 introgression lines harboring single or, in various combinations, complete and recombined L. elongatum chromosomes. Diploid wheatgrass Lophopyrum elongatum (genomes EE) possesses valuable traits for wheat genetics and breeding. We evaluated several strategies for introgression of this germplasm into wheat. To detect it, we developed and validated multiplexed sets of Sequenom MassARRAY single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers, which differentiated disomic and monosomic L. elongatum chromosomes from wheat chromosomes. We identified 130 introgression lines (ILs), which harbored 108 complete and 89 recombined L. elongatum chromosomes. Of the latter, 59 chromosomes were recombined by one or more crossovers and 30 were involved in centromeric (Robertsonian) translocations or were telocentric. To identify wheat chromosomes substituted for or recombined with L. elongatum chromosomes, we genotyped the ILs with the wheat 90-K Infinium SNP array. We found that most of the wheat 90-K probes correctly detected their targets in the L. elongatum genome and showed that some wheat SNPs are ancient and had originated prior to the divergence of the wheat and L. elongatum lineages. Of the 130 ILs, 52% were homozygous for Ph1 deletion and thus are staged to be recombined further. We failed to detect in the L. elongatum genome the 4/5 reciprocal translocation that has been reported in Thinopyrum bessarabicum and several other Triticeae genomes.

Indexed as

Crosses, GeneticGenome, PlantInbreedingPloidiesBreadChromosomes, PlantGenetic MarkersPoaceaePolymorphism, Single NucleotideTriticumGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID31980837
OpenAlexW3003099255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.