Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31980713›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

The prostaglandin receptor EP2 determines prognosis in EP3-negative and galectin-3-high cervical cancer cases.

Sebastian Dietlmeier, Yao Ye, Christina Kuhn, Aurelia Vattai, Theresa Vilsmaier, Lennard Schröder, Bernd P Kost, Julia Gallwas, Udo Jeschke, Sven Mahner and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sebastian DietlmeierDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU Munich, University Hospital, Campus Innenstadt, Munich, Germany.
Yao YeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU Munich, University Hospital, Campus Innenstadt, Munich, Germany.
Christina KuhnDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU Munich, University Hospital, Campus Innenstadt, Munich, Germany.
Aurelia VattaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU Munich, University Hospital, Campus Innenstadt, Munich, Germany.
Theresa VilsmaierDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU Munich, University Hospital, Campus Innenstadt, Munich, Germany.
Lennard SchröderDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU Munich, University Hospital, Campus Innenstadt, Munich, Germany.
Bernd P KostDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU Munich, University Hospital, Campus Innenstadt, Munich, Germany.
Julia GallwasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU Munich, University Hospital, Campus Innenstadt, Munich, Germany.
Udo JeschkeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU Munich, University Hospital, Campus Innenstadt, Munich, Germany. udo.jeschke@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2623-3235
Sven MahnerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU Munich, University Hospital, Campus Innenstadt, Munich, Germany.
Helene Hildegard HeideggerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU Munich, University Hospital, Campus Innenstadt, Munich, Germany.
LMU Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently our study identified EP3 receptor and galectin-3 as prognosticators of cervical cancer. The aim of the present study was the analysis of EP2 as a novel marker and its association to EP3, galectin-3, clinical pathological parameters and the overall survival rate of cervical cancer patients. Cervical cancer tissues (n = 250), as also used in our previous study, were stained with anti-EP2 antibodies employing a standardized immunohistochemistry protocol. Staining results were analyzed by the IRS scores and evaluated for its association with clinical-pathological parameters. H-test of EP2 percent-score showed significantly different expression in FIGO I-IV stages and tumor stages. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses indicated that EP3-negative/EP2-high staining patients (EP2 IRS score ≥2) had a significantly higher survival rate than the EP3-negative/EP2-low staining cases (p = 0.049). In the subgroup of high galectin-3 expressing patients, the group with high EP2 levels (IRS ≥2) had significantly better survival rates compared to EP2-low expressing group (IRS <2, p = 0.044). We demonstrated that the EP2 receptor is a prognostic factor for the overall survival in the subgroup of negative EP3 and high galectin-3 expressed cervical cancer patients. EP2 in combination with EP3 or galectin-3 might act as prognostic indicators of cervical cancer. EP2, EP3, and galectin-3 could be targeted for clinical diagnosis or endocrine treatment in cervical cancer patients, which demands future investigations.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Squamous CellFemaleGalectin 3HumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProtein IsoformsReceptors, Prostaglandin E, EP2 SubtypeBiomarkers, TumorGalectin 3Neoplasm ProteinsProtein IsoformsPTGER2 protein, humanPTGER3 protein, humanReceptors, Prostaglandin E, EP2 SubtypeReceptors, Prostaglandin E, EP3 Subtype

Identifiers

PMID31980713
PMCPMC6981231
OpenAlexW3001825664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.