Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31980628›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Spatial attention enhances network, cellular and subthreshold responses in mouse visual cortex.

Anderson Speed, Joseph Del Rosario, Navid Mikail, Bilal Haider

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Neuronal Features of Visual Attention in the Mouse Superior Colliculus Depend on Learned Behavioral Relevance.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Highly selective visual receptive fields in mouse frontal cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Reward history guides focal attention in whisker somatosensory cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Common and distinct neural mechanisms of attention.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anderson SpeedGeorgia Institute of Technology & Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9238-1696
Joseph Del RosarioGeorgia Institute of Technology & Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Navid MikailGeorgia Institute of Technology & Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Bilal HaiderGeorgia Institute of Technology & Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. bilal.haider@bme.gatech.edu.
Georgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Circuit and Synaptic Mechanisms of Visual Spatial AttentionR01NS109978 · NINDS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI HAIDER, BILAL · 2018 to 2022
$2.3M
Directly measuring synaptic and population coupling in cortex during perceptionR01NS107968 · NINDS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI HAIDER, BILAL · 2018 to 2022
$2.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS107968NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS109978
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Internal brain states strongly modulate sensory processing during behaviour. Studies of visual processing in primates show that attention to space selectively improves behavioural and neural responses to stimuli at the attended locations. Here we develop a visual spatial task for mice that elicits behavioural improvements consistent with the effects of spatial attention, and simultaneously measure network, cellular, and subthreshold activity in primary visual cortex. During trial-by-trial behavioural improvements, local field potential (LFP) responses to stimuli detected inside the receptive field (RF) strengthen. Moreover, detection inside the RF selectively enhances excitatory and inhibitory neuron responses to task-irrelevant stimuli and suppresses noise correlations and low frequency LFP fluctuations. Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings reveal that detection inside the RF increases synaptic activity that depolarizes membrane potential responses at the behaviorally relevant location. Our study establishes that mice display fundamental signatures of visual spatial attention spanning behavioral, network, cellular, and synaptic levels, providing new insight into rapid cognitive enhancement of sensory signals in visual cortex.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsArousalAttentionBehavior, AnimalMaleMice, Inbred C57BLMotivationNeuronsPhotic StimulationPupilSensory ThresholdsSpace PerceptionTask Performance and AnalysisVisual CortexVisual Fields

Identifiers

PMID31980628
PMCPMC6981183
OpenAlexW3001806042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.