Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31980533›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Combinatorial protein-protein interactions on a polymerizing scaffold.

Andrés Ortiz-Muñoz, Héctor F Medina-Abarca, Walter Fontana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrés Ortiz-MuñozDivision of Biology and Bioengineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.ORCID 0000-0003-1824-3230
Héctor F Medina-AbarcaDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.ORCID 0000-0001-5828-6492
Walter FontanaDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 walter_fontana@hms.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4062-9957

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scaffold proteins organize cellular processes by bringing signaling molecules into interaction, sometimes by forming large signalosomes. Several of these scaffolds are known to polymerize. Their assemblies should therefore not be understood as stoichiometric aggregates, but as combinatorial ensembles. We analyze the combinatorial interaction of ligands loaded on polymeric scaffolds, in both a continuum and discrete setting, and compare it with multivalent scaffolds with fixed number of binding sites. The quantity of interest is the abundance of ligand interaction possibilities-the catalytic potential Q-in a configurational mixture. Upon increasing scaffold abundance, scaffolding systems are known to first increase opportunities for ligand interaction and then to shut them down as ligands become isolated on distinct scaffolds. The polymerizing system stands out in that the dependency of Q on protomer concentration switches from being dominated by a first order to a second order term within a range determined by the polymerization affinity. This behavior boosts Q beyond that of any multivalent scaffold system. In addition, the subsequent drop-off is considerably mitigated in that Q decreases with half the power in protomer concentration than for any multivalent scaffold. We explain this behavior in terms of how the concentration profile of the polymer-length distribution adjusts to changes in protomer concentration and affinity. The discrete case turns out to be similar, but the behavior can be exaggerated at small protomer numbers because of a maximal polymer size, analogous to finite-size effects in bond percolation on a lattice.

Indexed as

LigandsPolymerizationPolymersProtein BindingProteinsLigandsPolymersProteinscombinatorial assemblypleiomorphic ensemblepolymerizing scaffold

Identifiers

PMID31980533
PMCPMC7022191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.