Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31980506›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2020

Zinc acetate lozenges for the treatment of the common cold: a randomised controlled trial.

Harri Hemilä, Jari Haukka, Marianne Alho, Jussi Vahtera, Mika Kivimäki

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03309995 (The Effect of Zinc Acetate Lozenges on the Rate of Recovery From the Common Cold), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03309995 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect of Zinc Acetate Lozenges on the Rate of Recovery From the Common Cold: a Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of HelsinkiRan2017 to 2018Enrolled87ConditionsCommon Cold, Respiratory Tract InfectionsArmsLozenges, Placebo lozenges
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Zinc for prevention and treatment of the common cold.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Dietary Supplements for COVID-19.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Harri HemiläDepartment of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland harri.hemila@helsinki.fi.ORCID 0000-0002-4710-307X
Jari HaukkaDepartment of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Marianne AlhoEspoo City Occupational Health Services, Espoo, Finland.
Jussi VahteraDepartment of Public Health, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-6036-061X
Mika KivimäkiCentre of Expertise for Work Organizations, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
University of Helsinki · FIEspoo Music Institute · FIFinnish Institute of Occupational Health · FIUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K013351/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine a commercially available zinc acetate lozenge for treating the common cold.

designRandomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.

settingWorking population in Finland.

participantsWe included men and women aged ≥18 years who usually had ≥1 cold per winter. Exclusions were pregnancy, lactation, chronic runny nose or chronic cough.

interventionWe randomised 253 participants to receive a package of lozenges to be taken if they caught the common cold. Of the 253 participants, 88 contracted the common cold and 87 were included in our primary analysis. Zinc acetate lozenges contained 13 mg elemental zinc and placebo lozenges contained sucrose octa-acetate to camouflage the taste of zinc. Instruction to use was six times per day for the maximum of 5 days. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Rate of recovery from the common cold analysed by Cox regression.

resultsThere was no difference in the recovery rate between zinc and placebo participants during the 10-day follow-up (rate ratio for zinc vs placebo=0.68, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.08; p=0.10). The recovery rate for the two groups was similar during the 5-day intervention, but for 2 days after the end of zinc/placebo use, the zinc participants recovered significantly slower compared with the placebo participants (p=0.003). In the zinc group, 37% did not report adverse effects, the corresponding proportion being 69% in the placebo group.

conclusionsA commercially available zinc acetate lozenge was not effective in treating the common cold when instructed to be used for 5 days after the first symptoms. Taste has been a common problem in previous zinc lozenge trials, but a third of zinc participants did not complain of any adverse effects. More research is needed to evaluate the characteristics of zinc lozenges that may be clinically efficacious before zinc lozenges can be widely promoted for common cold treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03309995.

Indexed as

Common ColdDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeZinc AcetateZinc Acetatecommon coldrandomised trialrespiratory infectionszinc lozenges

Identifiers

PMID31980506
PMCPMC7045205
OpenAlexW3001447450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.