Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31980504›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Workforce predictive risk modelling: development of a model to identify general practices at risk of a supply-demand imbalance.

Gary A Abel, Mayam Gomez-Cano, Navonil Mustafee, Andi Smart, Emily Fletcher, Chris Salisbury, Rupa Chilvers, Sarah Gerard Dean, Suzanne H Richards, F Warren and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. How new clinical roles in primary care impact on equitable distribution of workforce: a retrospective study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  6. Consequences of the closure of general practices: a retrospective cross-sectional study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Gary A AbelUniversity of Exeter Medical School (Primary Care), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK g.a.abel@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2231-5161
Mayam Gomez-CanoUniversity of Exeter Medical School (Primary Care), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Navonil MustafeeUniversity of Exeter Business School, Exeter, UK.
Andi SmartUniversity of Exeter Business School, Exeter, UK.
Emily FletcherUniversity of Exeter Medical School (Primary Care), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1319-3051
Chris SalisburyCentre for Academic Primary Care, NIHR School for Primary Care Research, School of Socialand Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4378-3960
Rupa ChilversTangerine Bee, Exeter, UK.
Sarah Gerard DeanPenCLAHRC University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3682-5149
Suzanne H RichardsAcademic Unit of Primary Care, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
F WarrenUniversity of Exeter Medical School (Primary Care), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
John L CampbellUniversity of Exeter Medical School (Primary Care), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Funding

Department of Health HS&DR/14/196/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to develop a risk prediction model identifying general practices at risk of workforce supply-demand imbalance.

designThis is a secondary analysis of routine data on general practice workforce, patient experience and registered populations (2012 to 2016), combined with a census of general practitioners' (GPs') career intentions (2016). SETTING/

participantsA hybrid approach was used to develop a model to predict workforce supply-demand imbalance based on practice factors using historical data (2012-2016) on all general practices in England (with over 1000 registered patients n=6398). The model was applied to current data (2016) to explore future risk for practices in South West England (n=368). PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome was a practice being in a state of workforce supply-demand imbalance operationally defined as being in the lowest third nationally of access scores according to the General Practice Patient Survey and the highest third nationally according to list size per full-time equivalent GP (weighted to the demographic distribution of registered patients and adjusted for deprivation).

resultsBased on historical data, the predictive model had fair to good discriminatory ability to predict which practices faced supply-demand imbalance (area under receiver operating characteristic curve=0.755). Predictions using current data suggested that, on average, practices at highest risk of future supply-demand imbalance are currently characterised by having larger patient lists, employing more nurses, serving more deprived and younger populations, and having considerably worse patient experience ratings when compared with other practices. Incorporating findings from a survey of GP's career intentions made little difference to predictions of future supply-demand risk status when compared with expected future workforce projections based only on routinely available data on GPs' gender and age.

conclusionsIt is possible to make reasonable predictions of an individual general practice's future risk of undersupply of GP workforce with respect to its patient population. However, the predictions are inherently limited by the data available.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAge FactorsEnglandFemaleGeneral PracticeGeneral PractitionersHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services Needs and DemandHealth WorkforceHumansMalePatient SatisfactionResidence CharacteristicsSex FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsWorkloadorganisation of health servicesprimary caresupply-demandworkforce

Identifiers

PMID31980504
PMCPMC7044996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.