Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31980427›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2020

In-Depth Profiling of Calcite Precipitation by Environmental Bacteria Reveals Fundamental Mechanistic Differences with Relevance to Application.

Bianca J Reeksting, Timothy D Hoffmann, Linzhen Tan, Kevin Paine, Susanne Gebhard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Microbially Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation byApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Review
  13. New insights intoFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bianca J ReekstingDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, Milner Centre for Evolution, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Timothy D HoffmannDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, Milner Centre for Evolution, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Linzhen TanDepartment of Architecture and Civil Engineering, BRE Centre for Innovative Construction Materials, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Kevin PaineDepartment of Architecture and Civil Engineering, BRE Centre for Innovative Construction Materials, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Susanne GebhardDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, Milner Centre for Evolution, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom s.gebhard@bath.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4783-6115

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbially induced calcite precipitation (MICP) has not only helped to shape our planet's geological features but is also a promising technology to address environmental concerns in civil engineering applications. However, limited understanding of the biomineralization capacity of environmental bacteria impedes application. We therefore surveyed the environment for different mechanisms of precipitation across bacteria. The most fundamental difference was in ureolytic ability, where urease-positive bacteria caused rapid, widespread increases in pH, whereas nonureolytic strains produced such changes slowly and locally. These pH shifts correlated well with patterns of precipitation on solid medium. Strikingly, while both mechanisms led to high levels of precipitation, we observed clear differences in the precipitate. Ureolytic bacteria produced homogenous, inorganic fine crystals, whereas the crystals of nonureolytic strains were larger and had a mixed organic/inorganic composition. When representative strains were tested in application for crack healing in cement mortars, nonureolytic bacteria gave robust results, while ureolytic strains showed more variation. This may be explained by our observation that urease activity differed between growth conditions or by the different natures and therefore different material performances of the precipitates. Our results shed light on the breadth of biomineralization activity among environmental bacteria, an important step toward the rational design of bacterially based engineering solutions.

Indexed as

Environmental MicrobiologyBacteriaCalcium CarbonateChemical PrecipitationCalcium CarbonateBacillusmicrobially induced calcite precipitationself-healing concreteureolysis

Identifiers

PMID31980427
PMCPMC7082560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.