ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2020
Prognostic value and risk stratification of residual disease in patients with incidental gallbladder cancer.
Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04321577 (Prospective Validation of a Residual Disease Predictive Score in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective Validation of a Residual Disease Predictive Score in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gallbladder carcinoma in Brazil: Clinicopathological profile and survival outcomes from a high-volume cancer center.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- New trends in diagnosis and management of gallbladder carcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Review
- The Significance of Tumor Budding and Immunohistochemical Axl Expression in Gallbladder AdenocarcinomasBalkan medical journal · 2022Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram to predict overall survival in patients with incidental gallbladder cancer: A retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Anatomic location of residual disease after initial cholecystectomy independently determines outcomes after re-resection for incidental gallbladder cancer.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2021Article
- Essential updates 2019/2020: Surgical treatment of gallbladder cancer.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2021Review
- Current and New Biomarkers for Early Detection, Prognostic Stratification, and Management of Gallbladder Cancer Patients.Cancers · 2020Review
- Prognostic Significance of Tumour Budding and Tumour-infiltrating Lymphocytes in Gallbladder Carcinoma.Journal of the West African College of SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimGiven their poor prognosis, patients with residual disease (RD) in the re-resection specimen of an incidental gallbladder carcinoma (IGBC) could benefit from a better selection for surgical treatment. The Gallbladder Cancer Risk Score (GBRS) has been proposed to preoperatively identify RD risk more precisely than T-stage alone. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of RD and to validate the GBRS in a retrospective series of patients. MATERIAL AND
methodsA prospectively collected database including 59 patients with IGBC diagnosed from December 1996 to November 2015 was retrospectively analyzed. Three locations of RD were established: local, regional, and distant. The effect of RD on overall survival (OS) was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method. To identify variables associated with the presence of RD, characteristics of patients with and without RD were compared using Fisher's exact test. The relative risk of RD associated with clinical and pathologic factors was studied with a univariate logistic regression analysis.
resultsRD was found in 30 patients (50.8%). The presence of RD in any location was associated with worse OS (29% vs. 74.2%, p = 0.0001), even after an R0 resection (37.7% vs 74.2%, p = 0.003). There was no significant difference in survival between patients without RD and with local RD (74.2% vs 64.3%, p = 0.266), nor between patients with regional RD and distant RD (16.1% vs 20%, p = 0.411). After selecting patients in which R0 resection was achieved (n = 44), 5-year survival rate for patients without RD, local RD, and regional RD was, respectively, 74.2%, 75%, and 13.9% (p = 0.0001). The GBRS could be calculated in 25 cases (42.3%), and its usefulness to predict the presence of regional or distant RD (RDRD) was confirmed (80% in high-risk patients and 30% in intermediate risk p = 0.041).
conclusionRDRD, but not local RD, represents a negative prognostic factor of OS. The GBRS was useful to preoperatively identify patients with high risk of RDRD. An R0 resection did not improve OS of patients with regional RD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.