Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31979294›Full record

ArticleNutrients2020

The Role of Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load in the Development of Real-Time Postprandial Glycemic Response Prediction Models for Patients With Gestational Diabetes.

Evgenii Pustozerov, Aleksandra Tkachuk, Elena Vasukova, Aleksandra Dronova, Ekaterina Shilova, Anna Anopova, Faina Piven, Tatiana Pervunina, Elena Vasilieva, Elena Grineva and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05179798 (The Study of Recommendation System DiaCompanion With Personalized Dietary Recommendations for Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05179798 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Study of Recommendation System DiaCompanion With Personalized Dietary Recommendations for Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (DiaCompanion I)

TypeinterventionalSponsorFederal State Budgetary Institution, V. A. Almazov Federal North-West Medical Research Centre, of the Ministry of HealthRan2022 to 2025Enrolled216ConditionsGestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)Armsmobile app
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Artificial Intelligence in Gestational Diabetes Care: A Systematic Review.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Evgenii PustozerovDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Saint Petersburg State Electrotechnical University, 197341 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Aleksandra TkachukInstitute of Endocrinology, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, 194156 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Elena VasukovaInstitute of Endocrinology, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, 194156 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Aleksandra DronovaInstitute of Endocrinology, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, 194156 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Ekaterina ShilovaInstitute of Endocrinology, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, 194156 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Anna AnopovaInstitute of Endocrinology, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, 194156 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Faina PivenInstitute of Endocrinology, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, 194156 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Tatiana PervuninaInstitute of Perinatology and Pediatrics, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, 197341 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Elena VasilievaInstitute of Endocrinology, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, 194156 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Elena GrinevaInstitute of Endocrinology, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, 194156 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Polina PopovaInstitute of Endocrinology, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, 194156 Saint Petersburg, Russia.

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 18-75-10042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incorporation of glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) is a promising way to improve the accuracy of postprandial glycemic response (PPGR) prediction for personalized treatment of gestational diabetes (GDM). Our aim was to assess the prediction accuracy for PPGR prediction models with and without GI data in women with GDM and healthy pregnant women. The GI values were sourced from University of Sydney's database and assigned to a food database used in the mobile app DiaCompanion. Weekly continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data for 124 pregnant women (90 GDM and 34 control) were analyzed together with records of 1489 food intakes. Pearson correlation (R) was used to quantify the accuracy of predicted PPGRs from the model relative to those obtained from CGM. The final model for incremental area under glucose curve (iAUC120) prediction chosen by stepwise multiple linear regression had an R of 0.705 when GI/GL was included among input variables and an R of 0.700 when GI/GL was not included. In linear regression with coefficients acquired using regularization methods, which was tested on the data of new patients, R was 0.584 for both models (with and without inclusion of GI/GL). In conclusion, the incorporation of GI and GL only slightly improved the accuracy of PPGR prediction models when used in remote monitoring.

Indexed as

Blood Glucose Self-MonitoringGlycemic IndexGlycemic LoadPostprandial PeriodAdultBiomarkersBlood GlucoseCase-Control StudiesDatabases, FactualDiabetes, GestationalFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansModels, BiologicalPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyBiomarkersBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanblood glucose predictiongestational diabetes mellitusglycemic indexpostprandial glycemic response

Identifiers

PMID31979294
PMCPMC7071209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.