Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31979257›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Coronary Artery Disease Diagnosis; Ranking the Significant Features Using a Random Trees Model.

Javad Hassannataj Joloudari, Edris Hassannataj Joloudari, Hamid Saadatfar, Mohammad GhasemiGol, Seyyed Mohammad Razavi, Amir Mosavi, Narjes Nabipour, Shahaboddin Shamshirband, Laszlo Nadai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
33.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.

Javad Hassannataj JoloudariDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran.
Edris Hassannataj JoloudariDepartment of Nursing, School of Nursing and Allied Medical Sciences, Maragheh Faculty of Medical Sciences, Maragheh, Iran.
Hamid SaadatfarDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran.
Mohammad GhasemiGolDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran.
Seyyed Mohammad RazaviDepartment of Electronics, Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran.
Amir MosaviKalman Kando Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Obuda University, 1034 Budapest, Hungary.
Narjes NabipourDepartment Institute of Research and Development, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam.
Shahaboddin ShamshirbandDepartment for Management of Science and Technology Development, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Laszlo NadaiKalman Kando Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Obuda University, 1034 Budapest, Hungary.
University of Birjand · IRObuda University · HUDuy Tan University · VNTon Duc Thang University · VNUniversity of Maragheh · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart disease is one of the most common diseases in middle-aged citizens. Among the vast number of heart diseases, coronary artery disease (CAD) is considered as a common cardiovascular disease with a high death rate. The most popular tool for diagnosing CAD is the use of medical imaging, e.g., angiography. However, angiography is known for being costly and also associated with a number of side effects. Hence, the purpose of this study is to increase the accuracy of coronary heart disease diagnosis through selecting significant predictive features in order of their ranking. In this study, we propose an integrated method using machine learning. The machine learning methods of random trees (RTs), decision tree of C5.0, support vector machine (SVM), and decision tree of Chi-squared automatic interaction detection (CHAID) are used in this study. The proposed method shows promising results and the study confirms that the RTs model outperforms other models.

Indexed as

Decision TreesSupport Vector MachineAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCoronary Artery DiseaseDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedbig datacoronary artery diseasedata scienceensemble modelhealth informaticsheart disease diagnosisindustry 4.0machine learningpredictive modelrandom forest

Identifiers

PMID31979257
PMCPMC7037941
OpenAlexW2999376617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.