Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31979221›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

Metabolism of Estrogens: Turnover Differs Between Platinum-Sensitive and -Resistant High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Cells.

Stefan Poschner, Judith Wackerlig, Dan Cacsire Castillo-Tong, Andrea Wolf, Isabel von der Decken, Tea Lanišnik Rižner, Renata Pavlič, Anastasia Meshcheryakova, Diana Mechtcheriakova, Monika Fritzer-Szekeres and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Research progress of omics technology in the field of tumor resistance: From singleZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2021
    Article
  7. Recent Metabolomics Analysis in Tumor Metabolism Reprogramming.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefan PoschnerDivision of Clinical Pharmacy and Diagnostics, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Judith WackerligDivision of Drug Design and Medicinal Chemistry, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Dan Cacsire Castillo-TongTranslational Gynecology Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Andrea WolfTranslational Gynecology Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Isabel von der DeckenTranslational Gynecology Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Tea Lanišnik RižnerInstitute of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Renata PavličInstitute of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Anastasia MeshcheryakovaDepartment of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Diana MechtcheriakovaDepartment of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Monika Fritzer-SzekeresDepartment of Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Theresia ThalhammerDepartment of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Walter JägerDivision of Clinical Pharmacy and Diagnostics, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATComprehensive Cancer Center Vienna · ATUniversity of Vienna · ATUniversity of Ljubljana · SI

Funding

Austrian Science Fund I 3417-B31Austrian Science Fund FWF I 3417European Union Seventh Framework Programe OCTIPS (Ovarian Cancer Therapy - Innovative Models Prolong Survival) 279113Slovenian Research Agency J3-8212Young Researcher grant R.P.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is currently treated with cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. The majority of patients show a primary response; however, many rapidly develop drug resistance. Antiestrogens have been studied as low toxic treatment options for HGSOC, with higher response rates in platinum-sensitive cases. Mechanisms for this difference in response remain unknown. Therefore, the present study investigated the impact of platinum resistance on steroid metabolism in six established HGSOC cell lines sensitive and resistant against carboplatin using a high-resolution mass spectrometry assay to simultaneously quantify the ten main steroids of the estrogenic metabolic pathway. An up to 60-fold higher formation of steroid hormones and their sulfated or glucuronidated metabolites was observed in carboplatin-sensitive cells, which was reversible by treatment with interleukin-6 (IL-6). Conversely, treatment of carboplatin-resistant cells expressing high levels of endogenous IL-6 with the monoclonal anti-IL-6R antibody tocilizumab changed their status to "platinum-sensitive", exhibiting a decreased IC

Indexed as

carboplatin resistancehigh-grade serous ovarian cancerinterleukin-6LC-HRMSmetabolomicssteroid hormones

Identifiers

PMID31979221
PMCPMC7072378
OpenAlexW3001944766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.