Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31978933›Full record

Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2020

Detection of acute 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) effects across protocols using automated natural language processing.

Carla Agurto, Guillermo A Cecchi, Raquel Norel, Rachel Ostrand, Matthew Kirkpatrick, Matthew J Baggott, Margaret C Wardle, Harriet de Wit, Gillinder Bedi

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. MDMA enhances positive affective responses to social feedback.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Using Language Processing and Speech Analysis for the Identification of Psychosis and Other Disorders.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Carla AgurtoComputational Biology Center - Neuroscience, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, USA.
Guillermo A CecchiComputational Biology Center - Neuroscience, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, USA. gcecchi@us.ibm.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1013-8348
Raquel NorelComputational Biology Center - Neuroscience, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7737-4172
Rachel OstrandComputational Biology Center - Neuroscience, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, USA.
Matthew KirkpatrickDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Matthew J BaggottAddiction and Pharmacology Research Laboratory, Friends Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Margaret C WardleDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Harriet de WitHuman Behavioral Pharmacology Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Gillinder BediCentre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, and Orygen National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia.
IBM (United States) · USFriends Research Institute · USOrygen Youth Health · AUUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Determinants of Drug Preference in Humans--Administrative SupplementR01DA002812 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DE WIT, HARRIET · 1985 to 2024
$10.6M
Neurobehavioral Mechanisms of Decisions to Smoke Marijuana and Cocaine in HumansK23DA034877 · NIDA · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI BEDI, GILLINDER I. · 2013 to 2017
$930k
Is Ecstasy an Empathogen? Effects of MDMA on Social and Emotional ProcessingR21DA026570 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DE WIT, HARRIET · 2009 to 2010
$424k
Automated Speech Analysis: A Marker of Drug Intoxication & Treatment OutcomeR03DA040855 · NIDA · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI FOLTIN, RICHARD W · 2016 to 2017
$162k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA034877NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA002812NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA040855NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA026570
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detection of changes in mental states such as those caused by psychoactive drugs relies on clinical assessments that are inherently subjective. Automated speech analysis may represent a novel method to detect objective markers, which could help improve the characterization of these mental states. In this study, we employed computer-extracted speech features from multiple domains (acoustic, semantic, and psycholinguistic) to assess mental states after controlled administration of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and intranasal oxytocin. The training/validation set comprised within-participants data from 31 healthy adults who, over four sessions, were administered MDMA (0.75, 1.5 mg/kg), oxytocin (20 IU), and placebo in randomized, double-blind fashion. Participants completed two 5-min speech tasks during peak drug effects. Analyses included group-level comparisons of drug conditions and estimation of classification at the individual level within this dataset and on two independent datasets. Promising classification results were obtained to detect drug conditions, achieving cross-validated accuracies of up to 87% in training/validation and 92% in the independent datasets, suggesting that the detected patterns of speech variability are associated with drug consumption. Specifically, we found that oxytocin seems to be mostly driven by changes in emotion and prosody, which are mainly captured by acoustic features. In contrast, mental states driven by MDMA consumption appear to manifest in multiple domains of speech. Furthermore, we find that the experimental task has an effect on the speech response within these mental states, which can be attributed to presence or absence of an interaction with another individual. These results represent a proof-of-concept application of the potential of speech to provide an objective measurement of mental states elicited during intoxication.

Indexed as

LanguageNeuropsychological TestsAdministration, IntranasalAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleN-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamineOxytocinPsycholinguisticsPsychotropic DrugsSemanticsSpeechYoung AdultN-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamineOxytocinPsychotropic Drugs

Identifiers

PMID31978933
PMCPMC7075895
OpenAlexW3002888945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.