Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31978814›Full record

ArticleBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2020

Improving breast cancer care coordination and symptom management by using AI driven predictive toolkits.

E C Moser, Gayatri Narayan

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07474584 (The OpRESTORE AI-Patient Navigator Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07474584 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The OpRESTORE AI-Patient Navigator Study: Developing and Testing an AI-enhanced Patient Navigator for UK Veterans With Service-related Physical Health Problems

TypeinterventionalSponsorImperial College Healthcare NHS TrustRan2026 to 2028Enrolled1,389ConditionsVeteranArmsAI-OpRESTORE healthcare navigator, OpRESTORE healthcare navigation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Qualitative analysis of cancer care experiences among rural cancer survivors and caregivers.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Nurse navigators' telemonitoring for cancer patients with COVID-19: a French case study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Survivorship Care of Older Adults With Cancer: Priority Areas for Clinical Practice, Training, Research, and Policy.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

E C MoserUM-AI Coordinator Research, UM-AI LLC, 8 the Green. Suite #5064, Dover, DE, 19901, USA. Electronic address: ecmoser@umaiworld.com.
Gayatri NarayanUM-AI Coordinator Research, UM-AI LLC, 8 the Green. Suite #5064, Dover, DE, 19901, USA. Electronic address: gayatri@umaiworld.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrated breast cancer care is complex, marked by multiple hand-offs between primary care and specialists over an extensive period of time. Communication is essential for treatment compliance, lowering error and complication risk, as well as handling co-morbidity. The director role of care, however, becomes often unclear, and patients remain lost across departments. Digital tools can add significant value to care communication but need clarity about the directives to perform in the care team. In effective breast cancer care, multidisciplinary team meetings can drive care planning, create directives and structured data collection. Subsequently, nurse navigators can take the director's role and become a pivotal determinant for patient care continuity. In the complexity of care, automated AI driven planning can facilitate their tasks, however, human intervention stays needed for psychosocial support and tackling unexpected urgency. Care allocation of patients across centres, is often still done by hand and phone demanding time due to overbooked agenda's and discontinuous system solutions limited by privacy rules and moreover, competition among providers. Collection of complete outcome information is limited to specific collaborative networks today. With data continuity over time, AI tools can facilitate both care allocation and risk prediction which may unveil non-compliance due to local scarce resources, distance and costs. Applied research is needed to bring AI modelling into clinical practice and drive well-coordinated, patient-centric cancer care in the complex web of modern healthcare today.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBreast NeoplasmsContinuity of Patient CareDecision MakingHealth Information SystemsHumansPatient Care TeamPatient NavigationRisk AssessmentCare allocationCare coordinationMultidisciplinary discussionNurse navigatorPredictive toolsSymptom management

Identifiers

PMID31978814
PMCPMC7375673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.