Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31978333›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2020

Iridescence as Camouflage.

Karin Kjernsmo, Heather M Whitney, Nicholas E Scott-Samuel, Joanna R Hall, Henry Knowles, Laszlo Talas, Innes C Cuthill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Light diffraction by sarcomeres produces iridescence in transmission in the transparent ghost catfish.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. All camouflage strategies are not equal.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. The genetic basis of structural colour variation in mimeticPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karin KjernsmoSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK. Electronic address: karin.kjernsmo@bristol.ac.uk.
Heather M WhitneySchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.
Nicholas E Scott-SamuelSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TU, UK.
Joanna R HallSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TU, UK.
Henry KnowlesSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.
Laszlo TalasSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TU, UK.
Innes C CuthillSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M002780/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Iridescence is a striking and taxonomically widespread form of animal coloration [1], but that its intense and varying hues could function as concealment [2] rather than signaling seems completely counterintuitive. Here, we show that the color changeability of biological iridescence, produced by multilayer cuticle reflectors in jewel beetle (Sternocera aequisignata) wing cases, provides effective protection against predation by birds. Importantly, we also show that the most likely mechanism to explain this increase in survival is camouflage and not some other protective function, such as aposematism. In two field experiments using wild birds and humans, we measured both the "survival" and direct detectability of iridescent and non-iridescent beetle models and demonstrated that the iridescent treatment fared best in both experiments. We also show that an increased level of specular reflection (gloss) of the leaf background leads to an increase in the survival of all targets and, for detectability by humans, enhances the camouflage effect of iridescence. The latter suggests that some prey, particularly iridescent ones, can increase their chance of survival against visually hunting predators even further by choosing glossier backgrounds. Our study is the first to present direct empirical evidence that biological iridescence can work as a form of camouflage, providing an adaptive explanation for its taxonomically widespread occurrence. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

Indexed as

Biological MimicryFood ChainIridescencePredatory BehaviorVisual PerceptionAnimalsColeopteraHumansSongbirdsanti-predator adaptationcamouflage, gloss, specular reflectioniridescencepredation, protective colorationSternocera aequisignata

Identifiers

PMID31978333
PMCPMC6997887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.