ArticleThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology2020
The Ficus erecta genome aids Ceratocystis canker resistance breeding in common fig (F. carica).
Article in The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polyembryonic or Apomictic Seeds Enable Fig Trees to Establish New Populations Without Their Pollinating Wasps, a Case Observation inEcology and evolution · 2025Article
- A chromosome-level genome assembly of Ficus benjamina, a fig tree with great ecological and ornamental value.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Phenotypic, Metabolic and Genetic Adaptations of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- First Evidence of Thalassochory in thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Hybridization, polyploidization, and morphological convergence make dozens of taxa into one chaotic genetic pool: a phylogenomic case of theFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Advancing understanding ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Genome sequencing and comparative analysis ofiScience · 2022Article
- Genomic and Bioinformatic Resources for Perennial Fruit Species.Current genomics · 2022Review
- The Diversity of Plant Sex Chromosomes Highlighted through Advances in Genome Sequencing.Genes · 2021Review
- Analysis of the Segregation Distortion ofFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- The complete plastid genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ficus erecta, a wild relative of the common fig (F. carica), is a donor of Ceratocystis canker resistance in fig breeding programmes. Interspecific hybridization followed by recurrent backcrossing is an effective method to transfer the resistance trait from wild to cultivated fig. However, this process is time consuming and labour intensive for trees, especially for gynodioecious plants such as fig. In this study, genome resources were developed for F. erecta to facilitate fig breeding programmes. The genome sequence of F. erecta was determined using single-molecule real-time sequencing technology. The resultant assembly spanned 331.6 Mb with 538 contigs and an N50 length of 1.9 Mb, from which 51 806 high-confidence genes were predicted. Pseudomolecule sequences corresponding to the chromosomes of F. erecta were established with a genetic map based on single nucleotide polymorphisms from double-digest restriction-site-associated DNA sequencing. Subsequent linkage analysis and whole-genome resequencing identified a candidate gene for the Ceratocystis canker resistance trait. Genome-wide genotyping analysis enabled the selection of female lines that possessed resistance and effective elimination of the donor genome from the progeny. The genome resources provided in this study will accelerate and enhance disease-resistance breeding programmes in fig.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.