Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31978257›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2020

Treatment for ascites in adults with decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis.

Amine Benmassaoud, Suzanne C Freeman, Davide Roccarina, Maria Corina Plaz Torres, Alex J Sutton, Nicola J Cooper, Laura Iogna Prat, Maxine Cowlin, Elisabeth Jane Milne, Neil Hawkins and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. [Guidelines on the management of ascites in cirrhosis (2023 version)].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2023
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Clinical research progress in different stages of recompensated cirrhosis].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Amine BenmassaoudRoyal Free Hospital and the UCL Institute of Liver and Digestive Health, Sheila Sherlock Liver Centre, London, UK.
Suzanne C FreemanUniversity of Leicester, Department of Health Sciences, University Road, Leicester, UK, LE1 7RH.
Davide RoccarinaRoyal Free Hospital and the UCL Institute of Liver and Digestive Health, Sheila Sherlock Liver Centre, London, UK.
Maria Corina Plaz TorresRoyal Free Campus, University College London, Rowland Hill Street, Hampstead, London, UK, NW3 2PF.
Alex J SuttonUniversity of Leicester, Department of Health Sciences, University Road, Leicester, UK, LE1 7RH.
Nicola J CooperUniversity of Leicester, Department of Health Sciences, University Road, Leicester, UK, LE1 7RH.
Laura Iogna PratRoyal Free Hospital and the UCL Institute of Liver and Digestive Health, Sheila Sherlock Liver Centre, London, UK.
Maxine CowlinPSC Support, PO Box 6945, London, UK.
Elisabeth Jane MilneCoventry University, Centre for Trust, Peace and Social Relations, Coventry, UK.
Neil HawkinsUniversity of Glasgow, HEHTA, University Ave Glasgow G12 8QQ, Glasgow, UK.
Brian R DavidsonUniversity College London, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, London, UK, NW3 2QG.
Chavdar S PavlovCopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Department 7812, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen, Denmark, DK-2100.
Douglas ThorburnRoyal Free Hospital and the UCL Institute of Liver and Digestive Health, Sheila Sherlock Liver Centre, London, UK.
Emmanuel TsochatzisRoyal Free Hospital and the UCL Institute of Liver and Digestive Health, Sheila Sherlock Liver Centre, London, UK.
Kurinchi Selvan GurusamyUniversity College London, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, London, UK, NW3 2QG.
University College London · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity of Leicester · GBSechenov University · RUCoventry University · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Department of Health SRP/16/114/17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately 20% of people with cirrhosis develop ascites. Several different treatments are available; including, among others, paracentesis plus fluid replacement, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts, aldosterone antagonists, and loop diuretics. However, there is uncertainty surrounding their relative efficacy.

objectivesTo compare the benefits and harms of different treatments for ascites in people with decompensated liver cirrhosis through a network meta-analysis and to generate rankings of the different treatments for ascites according to their safety and efficacy. SEARCH

methodsWe searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and trials registers until May 2019 to identify randomised clinical trials in people with cirrhosis and ascites. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or status) in adults with cirrhosis and ascites. We excluded randomised clinical trials in which participants had previously undergone liver transplantation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We performed a network meta-analysis with OpenBUGS using Bayesian methods and calculated the odds ratio, rate ratio, and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI) based on an available-case analysis, according to National Institute of Health and Care Excellence Decision Support Unit guidance. MAIN

resultsWe included a total of 49 randomised clinical trials (3521 participants) in the review. Forty-two trials (2870 participants) were included in one or more outcomes in the review. The trials that provided the information included people with cirrhosis due to varied aetiologies, without other features of decompensation, having mainly grade 3 (severe), recurrent, or refractory ascites. The follow-up in the trials ranged from 0.1 to 84 months. All the trials were at high risk of bias, and the overall certainty of evidence was low or very low. Approximately 36.8% of participants who received paracentesis plus fluid replacement (reference group, the current standard treatment) died within 11 months. There was no evidence of differences in mortality, adverse events, or liver transplantation in people receiving different interventions compared to paracentesis plus fluid replacement (very low-certainty evidence). Resolution of ascites at maximal follow-up was higher with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (HR 9.44; 95% CrI 1.93 to 62.68) and adding aldosterone antagonists to paracentesis plus fluid replacement (HR 30.63; 95% CrI 5.06 to 692.98) compared to paracentesis plus fluid replacement (very low-certainty evidence). Aldosterone antagonists plus loop diuretics had a higher rate of other decompensation events such as hepatic encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome, and variceal bleeding compared to paracentesis plus fluid replacement (rate ratio 2.04; 95% CrI 1.37 to 3.10) (very low-certainty evidence). None of the trials using paracentesis plus fluid replacement reported health-related quality of life or symptomatic recovery from ascites.

fundingthe source of funding for four trials were industries which would benefit from the results of the study; 24 trials received no additional funding or were funded by neutral organisations; and the source of funding for the remaining 21 trials was unclear. AUTHORS'

conclusionsBased on very low-certainty evidence, there is considerable uncertainty about whether interventions for ascites in people with decompensated liver cirrhosis decrease mortality, adverse events, or liver transplantation compared to paracentesis plus fluid replacement in people with decompensated liver cirrhosis and ascites. Based on very low-certainty evidence, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and adding aldosterone antagonists to paracentesis plus fluid replacement may increase the resolution of ascites compared to paracentesis plus fluid replacement. Based on very low-certainty evidence, aldosterone antagonists plus loop diuretics may increase the decompensation rate compared to paracentesis plus fluid replacement.

Indexed as

AscitesBayes TheoremHumansLiver CirrhosisParacentesisPortasystemic Shunt, Transjugular IntrahepaticRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID31978257
PMCPMC6984622
OpenAlexW2889613914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.