Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31978179›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Improved multi-parametric prediction of tissue outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients using spatial features.

Malte Grosser, Susanne Gellißen, Patrick Borchert, Jan Sedlacik, Jawed Nawabi, Jens Fiehler, Nils Daniel Forkert

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Big Data in Stroke: How to Use Big Data to Make the Next Management Decision.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Tissue outcome prediction in hyperacute ischemic stroke: Comparison of machine learning models.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Malte GrosserDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7139-3284
Susanne GellißenDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Patrick BorchertDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Jan SedlacikDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Jawed NawabiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Jens FiehlerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Nils Daniel ForkertDepartment of Radiology and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn recent years, numerous methods have been proposed to predict tissue outcome in acute stroke patients using machine learning methods incorporating multiparametric imaging data. Most methods include diffusion and perfusion parameters as image-based parameters but do not include any spatial information although these parameters are spatially dependent, e.g. different perfusion properties in white and gray brain matter. This study aims to investigate if including spatial features improves the accuracy of multi-parametric tissue outcome prediction. MATERIALS AND

methodsAcute and follow-up multi-center MRI datasets of 99 patients were available for this study. Logistic regression, random forest, and XGBoost machine learning models were trained and tested using acute MR diffusion and perfusion features and known follow-up lesions. Different combinations of atlas coordinates and lesion probability maps were included as spatial information. The stroke lesion predictions were compared to the true tissue outcomes using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) and the Dice metric.

resultsThe statistical analysis revealed that including spatial features significantly improves the tissue outcome prediction. Overall, the XGBoost and random forest models performed best in every setting and achieved state-of-the-art results regarding both metrics with similar improvements achieved including Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) reference space coordinates or voxel-wise lesion probabilities.

conclusionSpatial features should be integrated to improve lesion outcome prediction using machine learning models.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAcute DiseaseAgedArea Under CurveBrain InfarctionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalROC CurveStroke

Identifiers

PMID31978179
PMCPMC6980585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.