Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31978156›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Impact of early-onset persistent stunting on cognitive development at 5 years of age: Results from a multi-country cohort study.

Md Ashraful Alam, Stephanie A Richard, Shah Mohammad Fahim, Mustafa Mahfuz, Baitun Nahar, Subhasish Das, Binod Shrestha, Beena Koshy, Estomih Mduma, Jessica C Seidman and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 54 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Md Ashraful Alamicddr,b, Shaheed Tajuddin Ahmed Sarani, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-1389-8510
Stephanie A RichardFogarty International Center/National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
Shah Mohammad Fahimicddr,b, Shaheed Tajuddin Ahmed Sarani, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-3627-202X
Mustafa Mahfuzicddr,b, Shaheed Tajuddin Ahmed Sarani, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-4090-785X
Baitun Naharicddr,b, Shaheed Tajuddin Ahmed Sarani, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Subhasish Dasicddr,b, Shaheed Tajuddin Ahmed Sarani, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-7852-6569
Binod ShresthaWater Reed/AFRIMS Research Unit Nepal (WARUN), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Beena KoshyChristian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Estomih MdumaHaydom Lutheran Hospital, Haydom, Tanzania.
Jessica C SeidmanFogarty International Center/National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
Laura E Murray-KolbThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5836-9471
Laura E CaulfieldThe Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7152-1004
Tahmeed Ahmedicddr,b, Shaheed Tajuddin Ahmed Sarani, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-4607-7439
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDNational Institutes of Health · USChristian Medical College, Vellore · INHaydom Lutheran Hospital · TZJohns Hopkins University · USPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobally more than 150 million children under age 5 years were stunted in 2018, primarily in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and the impact of early-onset, persistent stunting has not been well explored. To explore the association between early-onset persistent stunting in children and cognitive development at 5 years of age, and to identify the factors associated with early-onset stunting. METHODS AND

findingsChildren from the MAL-ED cohort study were followed from birth to 5 years of age in six LMICs. The Wechsler Preschool Primary Scales of Intelligence (WPPSI) was used to assess cognitive abilities (fluid reasoning) at 5 years and was adapted for each culture. Stunting was categorized as early-onset persistent (first stunted at 1-6 months and persisting at 60 months), early-onset recovered (first stunted at 1-6 months and not stunted at 60 months), late-onset persistent (first stunted at 7-24 months and persisting at 60 months), late-onset recovered (first stunted at 7-24 months and not stunted at 60 months), and never (never stunted). Mixed effects linear models were used to estimate the relationship between stunting status and cognitive development. Children with early-onset persistent stunting had significantly lower cognitive scores (-2.10 (95% CI: -3.85, -0.35)) compared with those who were never stunted. Transferrin receptor (TfR) was also negatively associated with cognitive development (-0.31 (95% CI: -0.49, -0.13)), while the HOME inventory, an index of quality of the home environment (0.46 (95% CI: 0.21, 0.72)) and socio-economic status (1.50 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.98)) were positively associated with cognitive development.

conclusionsEarly-onset persistent stunting was associated with lower cognitive development in children at 5 years of age in this cohort of children.

Indexed as

Birth WeightBreast FeedingChildChild, PreschoolCognitionCognitive DysfunctionCohort StudiesFemaleGrowth DisordersHumansInfantInflammationIntelligence TestsLinear ModelsMalePoverty

Identifiers

PMID31978156
PMCPMC6980491
OpenAlexW3003135612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.