Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31978151›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Is it time to stop sweeping data cleaning under the carpet? A novel algorithm for outlier management in growth data.

Charlotte S C Woolley, Ian G Handel, B Mark Bronsvoort, Jeffrey J Schoenebeck, Dylan N Clements

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Artificial Intelligence-Based Medical Data Mining.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Veterinary Big Data: When Data Goes to the Dogs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Charlotte S C WoolleyThe Roslin Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9176-8389
Ian G HandelThe Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
B Mark BronsvoortThe Roslin Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Jeffrey J SchoenebeckThe Roslin Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Dylan N ClementsThe Roslin Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/ J004235/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/ J01446X/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20211551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All data are prone to error and require data cleaning prior to analysis. An important example is longitudinal growth data, for which there are no universally agreed standard methods for identifying and removing implausible values and many existing methods have limitations that restrict their usage across different domains. A decision-making algorithm that modified or deleted growth measurements based on a combination of pre-defined cut-offs and logic rules was designed. Five data cleaning methods for growth were tested with and without the addition of the algorithm and applied to five different longitudinal growth datasets: four uncleaned canine weight or height datasets and one pre-cleaned human weight dataset with randomly simulated errors. Prior to the addition of the algorithm, data cleaning based on non-linear mixed effects models was the most effective in all datasets and had on average a minimum of 26.00% higher sensitivity and 0.12% higher specificity than other methods. Data cleaning methods using the algorithm had improved data preservation and were capable of correcting simulated errors according to the gold standard; returning a value to its original state prior to error simulation. The algorithm improved the performance of all data cleaning methods and increased the average sensitivity and specificity of the non-linear mixed effects model method by 7.68% and 0.42% respectively. Using non-linear mixed effects models combined with the algorithm to clean data allows individual growth trajectories to vary from the population by using repeated longitudinal measurements, identifies consecutive errors or those within the first data entry, avoids the requirement for a minimum number of data entries, preserves data where possible by correcting errors rather than deleting them and removes duplications intelligently. This algorithm is broadly applicable to data cleaning anthropometric data in different mammalian species and could be adapted for use in a range of other domains.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDatabases, FactualData ManagementNonlinear Dynamics

Identifiers

PMID31978151
PMCPMC6980495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.