Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31977960›Full record

ReviewShock (Augusta, Ga.)2020

Exploring Clinically-Relevant Experimental Models of Neonatal Shock and Necrotizing Enterocolitis.

Lila S Nolan, James L Wynn, Misty Good

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Shock (Augusta, Ga.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Models of necrotizing enterocolitis.Seminars in perinatology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Editorial: Immunity in Compromised Newborns.Frontiers in immunology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lila S NolanDivision of Newborn Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
James L WynnDepartments of Pediatrics, Pathology, Immunology, and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Misty GoodDivision of Newborn Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Washington University in St. Louis · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Training of the Pediatric Physician-ScientistT32HD043010 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MARK E. LOWE · 2002 to 2026
$6.4M
Microfluidic Assessment of Clinical Outcomes in Preterm NewbornsR01HD089939 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI IRIMIA, DANIEL, MOLDAWER, LYLE L · 2017 to 2021
$3.3M
Modifiable Determinants of Mortality in Neonatal SepsisR01GM128452 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI WYNN, JAMES LAWRENCE · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
Modulation of the Intestinal Immune Response in Necrotizing EnterocolitisR01DK118568 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GOOD, MISTY L · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD089939NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD043010NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK118568NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM128452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonatal shock and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) are leading causes of morbidity and mortality in premature infants. NEC is a life-threatening gastrointestinal illness, the precise etiology of which is not well understood, but is characterized by an immaturity of the intestinal barrier, altered function of the adaptive immune system, and intestinal dysbiosis. The complexities of NEC and shock in the neonatal population necessitate relevant clinical modeling using newborn animals that mimic the disease in human neonates to better elucidate the pathogenesis and provide an opportunity for the discovery of potential therapeutics. A wide variety of animal species-including rats, mice, piglets, and primates-have been used in developing experimental models of neonatal diseases such as NEC and shock. This review aims to highlight the immunologic differences in neonates compared with adults and provide an assessment of the advantages and drawbacks of established animal models of both NEC and shock using enteral or intraperitoneal induction of bacterial pathogens. The selection of a model has benefits unique to each type of animal species and provides individual opportunities for the development of targeted therapies. This review discusses the clinical and physiologic relevance of animal models and the insight they contribute to the complexities of the specific neonatal diseases: NEC and shock.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsAnimals, NewbornEnterocolitis, NecrotizingHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Premature, DiseasesShock

Identifiers

PMID31977960
PMCPMC7376956
OpenAlexW3001996929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.