Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31977957›Full record

ArticleShock (Augusta, Ga.)2020

Proenkephalin Compared to Conventional Methods to Assess Kidney Function in Critically Ill Sepsis Patients.

Remi Beunders, Roger van Groenendael, Guus P Leijte, Matthijs Kox, Peter Pickkers

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Shock (Augusta, Ga.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Implementation and One-Year Evaluation of Proenkephalin A in Critical Care.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Proenkephalin A 119-159 in Kidney Transplantation: A Novel Biomarker for Superior Tracking of Graft Function Trajectories.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Remi BeundersDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Roger van GroenendaelDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Guus P LeijteDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Matthijs KoxDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Peter PickkersDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe assessment of renal function in clinical practice remains challenging. Using creatinine to assess the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is notoriously inaccurate, and determination of the true GFR, e.g., using inulin or iohexol, is laborious and not feasible in daily practice. Proenkephalin (PENK) is a novel candidate biomarker for kidney function that is filtrated in the glomerulus, has shown to represent steady-state GFR in patients with different severities of renal insufficiency. In this pilot study in non-steady-state critically ill patients, we compared plasma PENK concentrations with creatinine-based GFR assessments and validated both against the "true GFR" measured using a gold standard method: iohexol plasma clearance.

methodsTwenty-three critically ill patients with septic shock were included. Kidney function was determined using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula (eGFRMDRD), Endogenous Creatinine Clearance (GFRECC), and iohexol plasma clearance (GFRiohexol) during a 6-h window. Plasma PENK concentrations were measured using the penKid immunoassay.

resultsThe eGFRMDRD and GFRECC correlated with the GFRiohexol (R = 0.82, P < 0.0001 and R = 0.82, P < 0.0001 respectively); however, bias and variability were considerable: the eGFRMDRD overestimated the true GFR with 31 ± 35% (95% limits of agreement: -37% to 100%) and the GFRECC with 37 ± 49% (95% limits of agreement: -59% to 133%). Plasma PENK concentrations showed a very strong inverse correlation with the GFRiohexol (R = 0.90, P < 0.0001) which tended to be better compared with the correlation of eGFRMDRD (P = 0.06) and GFRECC (P = 0.08) with the GFRiohexol.

conclusionsIn this pilot study in non-steady-state critically ill sepsis patients, GFR appears to be more accurately reflected by plasma PENK concentrations compared to conventional creatinine-based methods. Therefore, PENK holds promise as an accurate and feasible biomarker to determine kidney function during non-steady-state conditions in the critically ill.

Indexed as

AgedCritical IllnessEnkephalinsHumansInulinIohexolKidneyKidney Function TestsMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProtein PrecursorsSepsisShock, SepticEnkephalinsInulinIohexolpreproenkephalinproenkephalinProtein Precursors

Identifiers

PMID31977957
PMCPMC7458088
OpenAlexW3003027350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.