Observational studyMedicine2020
Multiphase abdomen-pelvis CT in women of childbearing potential (WOCBP): Justification and radiation dose.
Observational study in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of Biological Damage Induced during Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) Examination.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2024Article
- Significant variation in computed tomography imaging of pregnant trauma patients: a retrospective multicenter study.Emergency radiology · 2024Article
- Understanding the harm of low-dose computed tomography radiation to the body (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2022Review
- Multicentric study of patients receiving 50 or 100 mSv in a single day through CT imaging-frequency determination and imaging protocols involved.European radiology · 2021Article
- Recommendations for reducing exposure to medical X-ray irradiation (Review).Medicine internationalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess justification and radiation doses of abdomen-pelvis CT in women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) scanned in 2 tertiary hospitals in Qatar.The local ethical committee approved retrospective study of 451 WOCBP (14-55 years) who underwent abdomen-pelvis CT examinations. Patients' age, clinical indications for ordered CT, scanner types and vendors, number and type of scan phases (non-contrast, arterial, portal venous, and/or delayed phases), and radiation dose descriptors (CT dose index volume - CTDIvol and dose length product- DLP) were recorded. Patients undergoing simultaneous chest-abdomen-pelvis CT were excluded. We classified the clinical indications for all 451 CT into indicated and unindicated based on the ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Information regarding the date of last menstrual period, likelihood of pregnancy, and if available, results of the pregnancy test were recorded. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics (median and inter-quartile range) and analysis of variance (ANOVA).None of the patients were pregnant at the time of their scanning. Amongst the 673 phases acquired for multiphase abdomen-pelvis CT in 451 patients, the 47% unindicated phases (315/673) included non-contrast (122/673, 18%), arterial (33/673, 5%), portal venous (125/673, 19%) and delayed (35/673, 5%) phases. The respective median DLP for indicated and unindicated phases were 266 and 758 mGy.cm (P < .0001).Multiphase abdomen-pelvis CT exams are frequent but seldom justified in WOCBP. They lead to a substantial increase in unindicated radiation dose compared to a single-phase CT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.