Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31977838›Full record

ArticlePain2020

Assessing peripheral fibers, pain sensitivity, central sensitization, and descending inhibition in Native Americans: main findings from the Oklahoma Study of Native American Pain Risk.

Jamie L Rhudy, Edward W Lannon, Bethany L Kuhn, Shreela Palit, Michael F Payne, Cassandra A Sturycz, Natalie Hellman, Yvette M Güereca, Tyler A Toledo, Felicitas Huber and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jamie L RhudyDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, United States.
Edward W LannonDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, United States.
Bethany L KuhnDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, United States.
Shreela PalitDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, United States.
Michael F PayneDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, United States.
Cassandra A SturyczDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, United States.
Natalie HellmanDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, United States.
Yvette M GüerecaDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, United States.
Tyler A ToledoDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, United States.
Felicitas HuberDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, United States.
Mara J DemuthDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, United States.
Burkhart J HahnDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, United States.
John M ChaneyDepartment of Psychology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, United States.
Joanna O ShadlowDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, United States.
University of Tulsa · USOklahoma State University · US

Funding

the Integrative and Multidisciplinary Pain and Aging Research Training (IMPART) ProgramT32AG049673 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI FILLINGIM, ROGER B · 2015 to 2024
$3.2M
Native American Pain Disparities: Exploring Nociceptive Processing DifferencesR01MD007807 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF TULSA · PI RHUDY, JAMIE LYNN · 2013 to 2016
$1.2M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG049673NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD007807
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Native Americans (NAs) have a higher prevalence of chronic pain than other U.S. racial/ethnic groups, but there have been few attempts to understand the mechanisms of this pain disparity. This study used a comprehensive battery of laboratory tasks to assess peripheral fiber function (cool/warm detection thresholds), pain sensitivity (eg, thresholds/tolerances), central sensitization (eg, temporal summation), and pain inhibition (conditioned pain modulation) in healthy, pain-free adults (N = 155 NAs, N = 150 non-Hispanic Whites [NHWs]). Multiple pain stimulus modalities were used (eg, cold, heat, pressure, ischemic, and electric), and subjective (eg, pain ratings and pain tolerance) and physiological (eg, nociceptive flexion reflex) outcomes were measured. There were no group differences on any measure, except that NAs had lower cold-pressor pain thresholds and tolerances, indicating greater pain sensitivity than NHWs. These findings suggest that there are no group differences between healthy NAs and NHWs on peripheral fiber function, central sensitization, or central pain inhibition, but NAs may have greater sensitivity to cold pain. Future studies are needed to examine potential within-group factors that might contribute to NA pain risk.

Indexed as

American Indian or Alaska NativeWhite PeopleAdolescentAdultCentral Nervous System SensitizationFemaleHumansInhibition, PsychologicalMaleNerve Fibers, MyelinatedNerve Fibers, UnmyelinatedNociceptionOklahomaPainPain ThresholdPostsynaptic Potential Summation

Identifiers

PMID31977838
PMCPMC7001897
OpenAlexW2980298735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.