Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31977308›Full record

ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2020

A randomized, crossover trial comparing the efficacy and safety of fesoterodine and extended-release oxybutynin in children with overactive bladder with 12-month extension on fesoterodine: The FOXY study.

Sophie Ramsay, Élizabeth Naud, David Simonyan, Katherine Moore, Stéphane Bolduc

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. First North American experience of propiverine use in children with overactive bladder.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sophie RamsayDivision of Urology, CHU de Québec - Université Laval Research Centre, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Élizabeth NaudDivision of Urology, CHU de Québec - Université Laval Research Centre, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
David SimonyanDivision of Urology, CHU de Québec - Université Laval Research Centre, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Katherine MooreDivision of Urology, CHU de Québec - Université Laval Research Centre, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Stéphane BolducDivision of Urology, CHU de Québec - Université Laval Research Centre, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Centre hospitalier de l'Université Laval · CACentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe sought to assess and compare safety and efficacy of fesoterodine and oxybutynin extended-release in the treatment of pediatric overactive bladder (OAB).

methodsWe conducted a non-inferiority, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial comparing fesoterodine 4-8 mg and oxybutynin 10-20 mg once daily (QD) in children with OAB aged 5-14 years (2015-2018). Every child received the first medication for eight weeks, followed by crossover to the second antimuscarinic after a three-days washout. Dose up-titration was possible at mid-course. Patients could enter a fesoterodine 12-month extension. Endpoints were assessed through changes on voiding diaries, Patient's Perception of Bladder Condition score (PPBC), adverse events, vital signs, electrocardiogram, post-void residual, urinalysis, and blood tests. The Wilcoxon rank sum and Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used for statistical analysis.

resultsA total of 62 patients were randomized (two early dropouts). Expected class effects (dry mouth/constipation) were present but no significant difference was observed. There was a 10.1 beats/minute increase in heart rate with fesoterodine (p<0.01) (oxybutynin-1.9 beats/min; p=non-significant [ns]). No life-threatening or serious adverse events occurred. Efficacy was similar for both drugs. Bladder capacity improved over the 16 months of the study; baseline capacity of 125 mL (44.5% expected bladder capacity for age [%EBC]) to 171 mL (53.9 %EBC) at the end of the extension phase. No clinical or statistical difference was shown between efficacy measures for fesoterodine or oxybutynin.

conclusionsThe use of fesoterodine or oxybutynin appear safe and effective for the treatment of OAB in children. Based on our study, long-term treatment to achieve the ultimate goal of urinary continence is needed in this population.

Identifiers

PMID31977308
PMCPMC7654663
OpenAlexW3002366806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.