Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31977298›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of pathology2020

Contributions of Eosinophils to Human Health and Disease.

Amy D Klion, Steven J Ackerman, Bruce S Bochner

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 147 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
147citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
24.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

147 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 233 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

87 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amy D KlionLaboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA; email: aklion@nih.gov.
Steven J AckermanDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60607, USA; email: sackerma@uic.edu.
Bruce S BochnerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA; email: bruce.bochner@northwestern.edu.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USNorthwestern University · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Eosinophils and Eosinophil Activation in the Pathogenesis of Human DiseaseZIAAI001130 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI KLION, AMY · 2010 to 2025
$22.5M
Using siglecs and their ligands to treat allergic diseases SALTADU19AI136443 · NIAID · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI SCHNAAR, RONALD L · 2018 to 2022
$7.6M
Targeting Siglec-8/Siglec-F Reduce Allergic Responses In Vitro and In VivoR01AI072265 · NIAID · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI BOCHNER, BRUCE S · 2007 to 2017
$3.9M
Regulation of food allergy and anaphylaxis by IL 33R01AI105839 · NIAID · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI BOCHNER, BRUCE S · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
Phase 2 Study of Esophageal String Test in Diagnosing Eosinophilic EsophagitisR01FD004086 · FDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI ACKERMAN, STEVEN JULES, FURUTA, GLENN T · 2013 to 2018
$1.6M
Targeting Siglec-8/-F to treat eosinophil and mast cell related disordersR56AI072265 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BOCHNER, BRUCE S · 2012 to 2012
$405k
Regulation of Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis by IL-33R56AI105839 · NIAID · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI BRYCE, PAUL J · 2013 to 2013
$352k
FDA HHS R01 FD004086NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI072265NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI105839NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI072265NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI105839NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI136443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human eosinophil has long been thought to favorably influence innate mucosal immunity but at times has also been incriminated in disease pathophysiology. Research into eosinophil biology has uncovered a number of interesting contributions by eosinophils to health and disease. However, it appears that not all eosinophils from all species are created equal. It remains unclear, for example, exactly how having eosinophils benefits the human host when helminth infections in the developed world have become scarce. This review focuses on our current state of knowledge as it relates to human eosinophils. When information is lacking, we discuss lessons learned from mouse studies that may or may not directly apply to human biology and disease. It is an exciting time to be an "eosinophilosopher" because the use of biologic agents that selectively target eosinophils provides an unprecedented opportunity to define the contribution of this cell to eosinophil-associated human diseases.

Indexed as

AnimalsDiseaseEosinophilsHelminthiasisHumansImmunity, InnateLeukocyte CountMicebiologic agentsbiomarkerscytokineseosinophileosinophil-related diseasesfunctionhematopoiesishypereosinophilic syndromephenotypetreatments

Identifiers

PMID31977298
PMCPMC7604902
OpenAlexW3001445168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.